期刊文献+

基于利益集团博弈的商会治理研究 被引量:3

Research on Governance of Chamber of Commerce Based on Games among Interest Groups
原文传递
导出
摘要 政府、企业群和商会三大利益集团的博弈,决定了商会的治理。商会的治理主要包含三个层面,一是商会的生成治理,涉及企业群与政府之间的博弈;二是商会的内部治理,涉及企业群与商会之间的博弈;三是商会的外部治理,涉及政府与商会之间的博弈。政府、企业群和商会两两之间的博弈,均形成不同的组合,反映了现实中我国商会生成、内部规范发展和外部规范发展的多元或复杂情况。 The games among government, firms and chamber of commerce decide the governance of chamber of commerce. The governance of chamber of commerce includes three aspects. The first one is generation governance of chamber of commerce which involves the games between firms and government. The second one is internal governance of chamber of commerce which involves the games between firms and chamber of commerce. The third one is external governance of chamber of commerce which involves the games between government and chamber of commerce. The games of government,finns and chamber of commerce form different combinations which reflect the Multivariate or Complicated Conditions of generation governance, internal governance and external governance of chamber of commerce in practice.
作者 冯巨章
机构地区 华南师范大学
出处 《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期75-83,共9页 China Economic Studies
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:11YJC790040) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(项目编号:11JDXM79003)"基于合法性视角的商会规制与企业社会责任演化研究:广东的实践和案例" 广东省软科学研究计划项目(项目编号:2011B070300108)
关键词 商会 治理 利益集团 博弈 chamber of commerce governance interest groups game
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Chamy D. 1990. Nonlegal Sanctions in Commercial Relationships [ J ]. Harvard Law Review, 104:373-467.
  • 2Greif A. 1993. Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Traders' Coalition [ J ]. The American Economic Review, 83 ( 3 ) :525-548.
  • 3Greif A, Milgrom P,Weingast B R. 1994. Coordination, Commitment and Enforcement:The Case of the Merchant Guild [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 102:745-775.
  • 4Nelson P A. 2004. The Effect of Innovation and Technological Change on Information Flows, Authority and Industry As- sociations in Japan[ DB/OL] Working Paper.
  • 5Schmitz H. 1995. Collective Efficiency:Growth Path for Small Scale Industry [ J]. Journal of Development Studies, 31 (4) :529-566.
  • 6Schneiberg M, Hollingsworth J R. 1990. Can Transaction Cost Economics Explain Trade Associations? [ A]. In Aoki M, Gustaffaon B, Williamson O. The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties. London and Beverly Hills : Sage Publications. pp. 320- 346.
  • 7Streeck W, Schmitter P C. 1985. Community Market,State and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order[ A]. In Streeck W, Schmitter P C. Private Interest Government:Beyond Market and State. London:Sage Publications Ltd. pp. 1-29.
  • 8Unger J. 1996. Bridges : Private Business, the Chinese Government and the Rise of New Association [ J ]. The China Quarterly, 147:795-819.
  • 9陈剩勇,马斌.温州民间商会:自主治理的制度分析——温州服装商会的典型研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(12):31-49. 被引量:92
  • 10冯巨章.企业合作网络的边界——以商会为例[J].中国工业经济,2006(1):72-79. 被引量:32

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部