期刊文献+

无机氮和葡萄糖添加对土壤微生物生物量和活性的影响 被引量:12

EFFECT OF AMENDMENT OF INORGANIC NITROGEN AND GLUCOSE ON SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS AND ACTIVITY
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以黄淮海平原潮土为研究对象,通过室内恒温恒湿培养方法,比较研究了土壤中纤维素是否存在时,外源无机氮和葡萄糖添加对土壤微生物生物量及其活性的影响变化。实验设8个处理,包括不加任何物质的对照(CK)、添加无机氮(N)、葡萄糖(G)、纤维素(C)处理及葡萄糖和无机氮同时添加(G+N)处理,以及在纤维素存在基础上添加无机氮(C+N)、葡萄糖(C+G)、葡萄糖和无机氮同时添加(C+G+N)处理。在33天培养时间内,分别在不同的时间间隔内测定了土壤CO2累积释放量、微生物生物量碳(Cmic)、及脱氢酶(DHD)、β-葡萄糖苷酶(GLU)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)、碱性磷酸酶(APH)活性。结果表明,所有测定的微生物性质在CK与C处理间均没有显著性差异。与CK和C处理相比,其他所有处理的土壤CO2累积释放量均显著增加,其中C+G+N处理达最大值;G、G+N、C+G、C+G+N处理的土壤Cmic含量及DHD和APH活性显著提升,尤其在培养的前14天,而N和C+N处理则与CK处理相似,表示添加葡萄糖可显著增加上述处理生物活性水平,而添加无机氮则不能。添加无机氮和葡萄糖对GLU和CAT的影响不明显,大部分情况下它们在处理间没有表现出显著性差异。相关性分析表明,CO2释放速率始终与APH活性成显著正相关,但与Cmic和其他酶活性之间的相关关系则随着培养时间的不同而发生变化,这可能与不同培养时间的微生物组成或微生物利用底物的模式发生改变有关。聚类分析结果进一步表明,8个处理的土壤微生物活性水平可明显分成3组,其中活性水平最高的组只包含C+G+N处理,该结果提示在难分解纤维素存在时,无机氮和易利用有机碳的同时添加对提升土壤微生物活性的重要性。 Changes in soil microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activity in fluvo-aquic soil of the North China Plain were investigated after the soil, with or without cellulose, was amended with inorganic nitrogen and glucose in the experiment of incubation under constant temperature and humidity. The experiment was designed to have 8 treatments, i.e. control (CK), addition of inorganic nitrogen (N), addition of glucose (G), addition of cellulose (C), addition of glucose and inorganic nitrogen (C+N), addition of inorganic nitrogen in soil with cellulose (C+N), addition of glucose treatment in soil with cellulose (C+G), and addition of glucose and inorganic nitrogen in soil with cellulose (C+G+N). Cumulative soil carbon dioxide release, microbial biomass carbon and activities of dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, catalase, and alkaline phosphatase were measured, separately at various intervals during the 33 days of incubation. Results show that in all microbial parameters no significant difference existed between CK and Treatment C. As against Treatments CK and C, all the treatments displayed a significant increase in cumulative carbon dioxide release, with Treatment C+G+N listed on the topmost. Treatments G, G+N, C+G, and C+G+N all showed an obvious increment in Cmic content and DHD, APH activity, particularly during the first two weeks of the incubation, while Treatments N and C+N displayed similarly like CK result. The findings implied that glucose could significantly increase microbial activity, but inorganic nitrogen could not. The effects of glucose and inorganic nitrogen on GLU and CAT were not obvious and in most cases no significant difference was found between different treatments. Correlation analysis demonstrates that carbon dioxide release rate was always positively related to APH activity, but not to Cmic and other enzymes activities and their relationships varied with the time of incubation, which was probably due to variation of the composition of soil microbial community or the way soil microbs utilize the substrates with the time of incubation. Cluster analysis further indicates that the 8 treatments could be sorted into three groups according to their soil microbial activity. Treatment C+G+N was the only one in the group of the highest activity, which suggests that it is important to amend the soil containing hard-to-decompose cellulose with inorganic nitrogen and readily available organic carbon at the same time for improving its soil microbial activity.
出处 《土壤学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期139-146,共8页 Acta Pedologica Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2011CB100506) 中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(KSCX2-EW-N-08)资助
关键词 纤维素 无机氮 葡萄糖 微生物生物量碳 酶活性 CO2累计释放量 Cellulose Inorganic nitrogen Glucose Microbial biomass carbon Enzyme activity Cumulative CO2 release
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1窦森,张晋京,Lichtfouse E.,曹亚澄.用δ^(13)C方法研究玉米秸秆分解期间土壤有机质数量动态变化[J].土壤学报,2003,40(3):328-334. 被引量:64
  • 2Kuzyakov Y. Riview: Factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2002, 165:382-396.
  • 3Abbadie L, Nacro H, Gignoux J. Soil carbon and organic matter dynamics. Lamto, Springer New York, 2006, 179 : 219-234.
  • 4Sinsa Baugh R L, Antibus R K, Linkins A E, et al. Wood decomposition over a first-order watershed: Mass loss as a functionof lingocellulase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1992, 24 : 743-749.
  • 5Conde E, Cardenas M, Ponce-Mendoza A, et al. The impacts of inorganic nitrogen application on mineralization of 14C-labelled maize and glucose, and on priming effect in saline alkaline soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37 : 681-691.
  • 6Hoyle F C, Murphy D V, Brookes P C. Microbial response to the addition of glucose in low-fertility soils. Biol Fertil Soils, 2008, 44:571-579.
  • 7Mondini C, Cayuela M L, Sanchez-Monedero M A, et al. Soil microbial biomass activation by trace amounts of readily available substrate. Biol Fertil Soils, 2006, 42:542-549.
  • 8Blagodatskaya E V, Blagodatsky S A, Anderson T-H, et al. Priming effects in Chemozem induced by glucose and N in relation to microbial growth strategies. Applied Soil Ecology, 2007, 37:95-105.
  • 9中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.102,3-10,66-71,141-144.
  • 10Chu H Y, Hosen Y, Yagi K, et al. Soil microbial biomass and activities in a Japanese Andisol as affected by controlled release and application depth off urea. Biol Fertil Soils, 2005, 42 : 89-96.

二级参考文献46

  • 1万忠梅,吴景贵.土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(6):87-92. 被引量:224
  • 2安韶山,黄懿梅,李壁成,刘梦云.用典范相关分析研究宁南宽谷丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤酶活性与肥力因子的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(5):704-709. 被引量:35
  • 3熊汉锋,黄世宽,陈治平,廖勤周,谭启玲.梁子湖湿地土壤酶初步研究[J].生态环境,2006,15(6):1305-1309. 被引量:12
  • 4马学慧,吕宪国,杨青,阎敏华.三江平原沼泽地碳循环初探[J].地理科学,1996,16(4):323-330. 被引量:75
  • 5窦森 Litchfouse E Marlotti A.土壤有机质的δ^13C研究:农业持续发展的土壤培肥研究[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,1995.116-119.
  • 6Max M C,Wood M,Jarvis S C. A mieroplate flurimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils [J]. Soil Biology& Biochemistry, 2001,33 : 1633-1640.
  • 7Dick R P. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality [C]// Doran J W, Coleman D C, Bezdicek D F, et al. Defining Soil Quality for A Sustainable Environment. Madison,WI: American Society of Agronomy, 1994: 107-124.
  • 8Dick R P. Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health[C] //Pankhurstl C E,Double B M,Gupta V V S R. Biological Indicators of Soil Health. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 1997 : 121-156.
  • 9Yao X H, Min H,Lu H Z, et al. Influence of aeetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration [J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006,42 : 120-126.
  • 10Chrost R J. Environmental control of the synthesis and activity of aquatic microbial ectoenzymes [C]//Chrost R J. Microbial Enzymes in Aquatic Environments. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1991 : 29-53.

共引文献149

同被引文献201

引证文献12

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部