美国课程一致性研究的演进与启示被引量：53

The Evolution of the Consistency Study of the Curriculum in America and its Implications

导出

摘要课程与教学的一致性是检测是否有效落实课程标准的关键性指标之一。以韦伯研究工具的构建为标志,美国课程一致性研究范式实现了由高内容效度向高一致性的转型。在此基础上,开发了用于一致性分析的Achieve、SEC及SRI等研究工具,一致性研究呈现出综合化、整体化、精细化的态势。对于我国刚起步的一致性研究而言,需要依据特定的研究目的、围绕要解决的核心问题、综合分析各种研究范式的应用可能,从而形成具有针对性的一致性研究工具。 The consistencY between curriculum and teaching is one of the key indicators to test the effective implementation of curriculum standards. Marked with the construction of Webb Tool, the criteria for curriculum match turns from high validity to high consistency. Based on the Webb Tool,some research tools such as Achieve,SEC and SRI have been developed for the consistency analysis,the research has shown such tendency as syntheses,integration and elaboration. In the case of the beginning consistency research of our country,we need to surround the core issues,analyze the possibility of applying different researching paradigm so as to develop our own consistency analysis tool according to the specific research aims.

作者杨玉琴王祖浩张新宇

机构地区华东师范大学化学系华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院

出处《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期113-121,共9页 Studies in Foreign Education

关键词课程一致性韦伯研究工具 Achieve研究工具 SEC研究工具 curriculum consistency Webb Tool Achieve Tool SEC Tool

分类号 G622.3 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Norman,L.Webb. Alignment of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States [ R]. Washington, DC :Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.23.
2S. Sireei,F. Robin,K. Meara,H. Rogers,H. Swaninathan. An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework [A]. N. Raju,J. Pelligrino,M. Bertenthal,K. Mitchell,L. Jones (Eds.). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP [C]. Washington, DC : National Academies Press,2000.74-100.
3R. Rothman,J. Slattery,J. Vranek, L. Resnick. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing[ J ]. Educational Assessment, 2004,9 (1-2) : 1-27.
4N. Webb. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education (Research Monograph No. 6) [ M ]. Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.
5N. Webb. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States (Research Monograph No. 18) [M]. Washington,DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.
6A. Martone,S. Sireci. Evaluating Alignment between Curriculum,As- sessment,and Instruction[J]. Review of Educational Research,2009,79(4) : 1332-1361.
7Achieve Inc. An Alignment Analysis of Washington State's College Readiness Mathemat- ics Standards with Various Local Placement Tests. Washington,DC : Achieve Inc,2006.
8A. Porter,J. Smithson. Defining,Developing,and Using Curriculum Indicators. (CPRE Research Report Series No. RR--O48)[R ]. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2001.
9A. Porter,M. Polikoff,T. Zeidner,J. Smithson. The Quality of Content Analysis of State Stu- dent Achievement Tests and Content Standards [J]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2008,27(4) : 2-14.
10R. Blank,A. Porter, J. Smithson. New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics and Science[M ]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Omcers, 2001.