期刊文献+

磁共振靶向对比剂在淋巴结成像中的研究进展 被引量:1

Progress of MR Targeted Contrast Agents in Lymphography
暂未订购
导出
摘要 准确评价淋巴结转移与否关系到对肿瘤患者的分期和预后的判断。目前对淋巴结良恶性诊断的主要依据为淋巴结的大小和形态,正常大小的转移性淋巴结很可能被遗漏,增大的淋巴结是良性增生还是恶性转移也很难鉴别。近年来随着MR特异性对比剂,特别是MR靶向淋巴结对比剂的发展,MR淋巴成像(MR Lymphography,MRL)显示了极为诱人的前景。该文主要介绍MR淋巴靶向对比剂的研究进展。 The accurate evaluation of tumor metastases in prognosis in cancer patients. At present, differentiating between lymph nodes is important for tumor staging and malignant and benign lymph nodes still rely only on the size and shape of the lymph nodes. Thus, small metastases in normal size lymph nodes can be missed, and it is difficult to differentiate enlarged nodes (benign hyperplasia versus malignant disease). Recently, with the advancement of the MR specificity contrast agents, especially MR lymphotropic contrast medium, MR lymphography has shown attractive perspective. This summary mainly introduces the progress of MR targeted contrast agents in lymphography.
作者 解骞 梁宗辉
出处 《生物医学工程学进展》 CAS 2011年第4期206-209,共4页 Progress in Biomedical Engineering
关键词 磁共振成像 靶向对比剂 淋巴成像 淋巴结转移 MR_I, targeted contrast agents, lymphography,lymph node metastases
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1李树本,何建行,陈汉章,葛林虎,韦兵,殷伟强,成向阳,刘君,徐鑫.纳米炭在微创肺癌淋巴结清扫术中的应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(3):228-230. 被引量:9
  • 2Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging[J]. Radiology,2001,219(2) :316-333.
  • 3Zhao Y, Xing G, Chai Z. Nanotoxicology: Are carbon nanotubes safe? [J]. Nat Nanotechnol,2008,3(4) :191-192.
  • 4Staufer U, Akiyama T, Gullo M R, et al. Micro-and nanosystems for biology and medicine [ J ]. Microelectronic Engineering,2007,84 (5-8 ) : 1681-1684.
  • 5Ross R W, Zietman A L, Xie W, et al. Lymphotlropic nanoparficleenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LNMRI) identifies occult lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patiems prior to salvage radiation therapy [ J ]. Clin Imaging,2009,33 (4) :301-305.
  • 6Kimura K, Tanigawa N, Matsuki M, et al. High-resolution MR lymphography using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) in the evaluation of axillra'y lymph nodes in patients with early stage breast cancer: preliminary results[ J]. Breast Cancer,2010,17(4) :241 -246.
  • 7Eisner B H, Feldman A S. Nanoparticle imaging for genitourinary cancers[J]. Caneer Biomark,2009,5(2) :75 -79.
  • 8Misselwitz B. MR contrast agents in lymph node imaging[ J ]. European Journal of Radiology,2006,58(3) :375 -382.
  • 9Ruehm S G, Schroeder T, Debatin J F. Interstitial MR lymphography with gadoterate meglumine: initi~d experience in humans[ J]. Radiology,2001,220(3) :816-821.
  • 10Islam T, Harisinghani M G. Overview of nanoparticle use in cancer imaging[J]. Cancer Biomark,2009,5(2) :61 -67.

二级参考文献21

  • 1张镜如 乔健天.生理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.85-146.
  • 2Gajra A, Newman N, Gamble GP, et al. Effect of number of lymph nodes sampled on outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21:1029-1034.
  • 3Okamoto K, Sawai K, Minato H, et al. Number and anatomical extent of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: analysis using intra-lymph node injection of activated carbon particles ( CH40 ). Jpn J Clin Oncol, 1999, 29:74-77.
  • 4Naruke T, Suemasu K, Ishlkawa S. Lymph node mapping and curability at various levels of metastasis in resected lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1978, 76:832-839.
  • 5Stella B, Arpicco S, Peracchia MT, et al. Design of folic acidconjugated nanoparticles for drug targeting. J Phann Sci, 2000, 89 : 1452-1464.
  • 6Watanahe A, Koyanagi T, Ohsawa H, et al. Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study. Surgery, 2005, 138:510-517.
  • 7Ludwig MS, Goodman M, Miller DL, et al. Postoperative survival and the number of lymph nodes sampled during resection of node-negative non-small cell lung cancer. Chest, 2005, 128:1545-1550.
  • 8Smythe WR. Treatment of stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung carcinoma. Chest, 2003, 123:181S-187S.
  • 9Gipponi M, Bassetti C, Canavese G, et al. Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol, 2004, 85:102-111.
  • 10Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339:941-946.

共引文献46

同被引文献17

  • 1Ruehm SG, Corot C, Debatin JF. Interstitial MR lymphography with a eonventional extracellular gadolinium based agent., assess ment in rabbits[J]. Radiology,2001,218(3) :664-669.
  • 2Kiryu S,Inoue Y,Sheng F,et al. Interstitial MR lymphography in mice: comparative study with gadofluorine 8, gadofluorine M, and gadofluorine P[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2 012,11 (2) : 9 9-10 7.
  • 3Kitamura N,Kosuda S,Araki K,et al. Comparison of animal stud ies between interstitial magnetic resonance lymphograpby and ra- dioeolloid SPECT/CT lymphoseintigraphy in the head and neck region[J]. Ann Nucl Med,2012,26(3):281 285.
  • 4Mounzer R, Shkarin P, Papademetris X, et al. Dynamic imaging of lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes using a bimodal nanoparticu- late contrast agent[J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2007,5 (3) : 151-158.
  • 5Hama Y,Bernardo M,Regino CA,et al. MR lymphangiography u sing dentdrimer based contrast agents: a comparison at 1. 5T and 3.0TE[J]. Magn Reson Med,2007,57(2) :431-436.
  • 6Kobayashi H, Kawamoto S, Brechbiel MW, et ah Detection of lymph node involvement in hematologic malignancies using mi- cromagnetic resonance lymphangiography with a gadolinum-la- beled dendrimer nanopartiele[J]. Neoplasia, 2005, 7 (11): 984- 991.
  • 7Kobayashi H,Kawamoto S,Bernardo M,et al. Delivery of gadolin ium-labeled nanoparticles to the sentinel lymph node:comparison of the sentinel node visualization and estimations of intra-nodal gadolinium concentration by the magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Control Release, 2006,111 (3) : 343-351.
  • 8Kobayashi H,Kawamoto S,Sakai Y,et al. Lymphatic drainage im aging of breast cancer in mice by micro-magnetic resonance lyre phangiography using a nano-size paramagnetic contrast agent[J] J Natl Cancer Inst,2004,96(9):703 708.
  • 9Kobayashi H,Kawamoto S,Choyke PL, et al. Comparison of den drimer based macromolecular contrast agents for dynamic micro magnetic resonance lymphangiography [J]. Magn Reson Med, 2003.50(4) ,758 766.
  • 10Sheng F, Inoue Y, Kiryu S, et al. Interstitial MR lymphography in mice with gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium[J] J Magn Reson Imaging,2011,33(2) :490-497.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部