摘要
目的观察温通针法和普通针刺治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)疗效差异性,提倡临床运用针刺手法。方法 154例LSS患者按随机数字表随机分为对照组(77例)和治疗组(77例),在治疗前后采用LSS症状体征评分、脊髓功能评分、生活质量评分、疗效、随访等方面比较。结果两种方法治疗LSS在症状体征评分、脊髓功能评分、生活质量评分、疗效、随访等方面有差异(P<0.05)。结论 两种针刺方法对LSS都有治疗作用,温通针法疗效优于普通针刺方法,且疗效较稳定。
Objective To observe the difference of therapeutic effects between warm-dredging needling method and ordinary needling method in treating lumbar spinal stenosis （LSS）, and to promote the application of needling manipulations in clinic. Method A total of 154 patients with LSS were randomized into a control group （n=77） and a treatment group （n=77） according to the random number table. The LSS sign and symptom scoring system, spinal function rating scale, quality of life, therapeutic effects and follow-up study were adopted in the comparison before and after treatment. Result There were significant differences between the two needling methods for LSS in comparing the sign and symptom scores, spinal function score, quality of life, therapeutic effects and follow-up study results （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The two needling methods were both effective in treating LSS. However, compared with the ordinary needling method, the warm-dredging needling method has better and more stable therapeutic effect.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2011年第12期845-847,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基金
上海市卫生局2009-2010年度社区及农村中医药服务科研专项计划(2009S016)
上海市长宁区卫生系统"明日之星"培养计划项目
关键词
针刺
刺法
温通针法
腰椎管狭窄症
Acupuncture
Needling method
Warm-dredging needling method
Lumbar spinal stenosis
