期刊文献+

“以人为本”:社会主义发展模式对资本逻辑的超越 被引量:2

Human-orientation: Socialist Development Model beyond the Capital Logic
原文传递
导出
摘要 自上世纪四十年代以来,人们一直在反思增长主义的发展模式,反思人与自然、人与人、人与自身如何和谐发展的问题,但始终没有得到有效的解决,反而扩展为全球性的发展难题。原因在于"资本逻辑"作为一种非人性的力量统治着整个全球社会,把人和自然作为资本增殖的工具。无论是根据马克思主义学说,还是从20世纪社会主义的经验教训来分析,都说明"以人为本"才能超越资本逻辑。中国特色的社会主义实践需要将"以人为本"作为一种新的意识形态。 Since the 1940s people have been in reflections on the development model of growth-oriented, and the harmonious rela- tions between the human being and nature, human being and society, people and their own. The development dilemma has not been re- solved effectively, but also expanded to global. The reason is that the capital logic has been dominating the entire society as an inhuman power, human being and nature has been become the tools for the capital proliferation. Under the Marxist theory and the socialist prac- tice during 20th century, it is analyzed that the "human-oriented" logic has the necessity and feasibility to go beyond the capital logic.
出处 《上海行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期50-57,共8页 The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
关键词 资本逻辑 以人为本 社会主义 意识形态 Capital Logic Human-orientation Socialism Ideology
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献10

  • 1戴维·科兹文,倪刚,常辉(译),朱贵昌(校).论政府在经济转型中的作用——俄罗斯与中国过渡经验之比较[J].当代世界社会主义问题,2005(3):3-14. 被引量:10
  • 2James D.Faubion,Modern Greek Leseons:A Primer in Historical Constructivism,Princeton,Princeton University Prses,1993,pp.113-115.
  • 3S.N.Eisenstadt,"The Axial Age:The Emergence of Transcendental Visions and the Rise of Clerics",op.cit.; idem,ed.,The Origins and Diversity of Axial-Age Civilizations,op.cit.
  • 4D.Lerner,ed.,The Passing of Traditional Society:Mod ernizing the Middle East,Glencoe,Ⅲ.,Free Press,1958.
  • 5S.N.Eisenstadt,"Frameworks of the Great Revolutions:Culture,Social Structure,History and Human Agency",international Social Science Journal,Vol.133,1992,pp.385-401.
  • 6S.N.Eisenstadt and B.Giesen,"The construction of collective identity",European Journal of Sociology,No.1,1995,pp.72-102.
  • 7A.Inkeles and D.H.Smith,Becoming Modern:individual Change in Six Developing Countries,Cambridge,Mass.,Harvard University Press,1974.
  • 8E.Shils,"Primordial,Personal,Sacred and Civil Ties",in idem,ed.,Center and Periphery:Essays in Macrosociology,Chicago,Chicago University Press,1975,pp.111-126.
  • 9张征,闫永飞.“新自由主义与全球金融、经济危机”国际学术研讨会综述[J].国外理论动态,2009(9):91-97. 被引量:5
  • 10大卫·科兹,常辉(译),冯克利(校).坚持社会主义:苏联的教训和中国的经验[J].当代世界社会主义问题,2009(4):45-49. 被引量:3

共引文献18

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部