期刊文献+

Stability Assessment of Some West African Okra (Abelmoschus caillel~ Genotypes in Nigerian Genebank

Stability Assessment of Some West African Okra (Abelmoschus caillel~ Genotypes in Nigerian Genebank
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Stability among 50 accessions of West African okra (Abelmoschus caillei) was assessed under three diverse ecological environments at Abeokuta, Ibadan and Mokwa in Nigeria during 2005 and 2006 cropping season. The accessions were grown in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications; data were collected on 5-10 randomly selected plants from each plot. Only 20 accessions were subjected to stability analysis on the basis of yield across the three environments. The joint regression analysis, deviation means square were computed using Eberhart and Russell method and complemented with Francis and Kannenberg method. The regression coefficients of accessions mean yields on the environmental index resulted in regression coefficients ranging in values from 0.5549 to 1.6667. OAA/96/175-5328, NGAE-96-011 and NGAE-96-0060 were among the superior genotypes with high yield performance. The large variation in regression values indicated large differences in genotype response to different environments. It suggests that stability concept of Ebelhart and Russell could be modified to use any yield components that has strong correlation with yield for stability analysis. The two promising accessions ofA. caillei (NGAE-96-011 and NGAE-96-0060) needed to be further tested on farmers' field to obtain on-farm data, alter which it should be recommended for official registration and released by the National Committee on Naming, Registration and Release of Crop varieties in Nigeria.
出处 《Journal of Life Sciences》 2011年第11期906-912,共7页 生命科学(英文版)
关键词 Stability assessment environmental index GENOTYPE West African okra. 稳定性评价 基因型差异 尼日利亚 黄秋葵 西非 基因库 随机区组设计 稳定性分析
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1O. Gulsen, S. Karagul, K. Abak, Diversity and relationships among Turkish germplasm by SRAP and phenotypic marker polymorphism, Biologia, Bratislava, 62 (1) (2007) 41-45.
  • 2A. Ghaderi, E.H. Everson, C.E. Cress, Classification of environments and genotypes in wheat, Crop Sci. 20 (1980) 707-710.
  • 3S. Ceccarelli, Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interaction in relation to sustainability and biodiversity, in: M. Cooper, G.L. Hammer (Eds.), Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement, CABI, Wallingford, UK, 1996, oo. 467-486.
  • 4J. Crossa, Statistical analyses of multilocation trials, Adv. Agron. 44 (1990) 55-85.
  • 5IBPGR (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources), Report on International Workshop on Okra Genetic Resources Held at the National Bureau for Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India, October 8-12, 1990.
  • 6S.A. Eberhart, W.A. Russell, Stability prameters for comparing varieties crop, Sc. 6 (1996) 36-40.
  • 7T.R. Francis, L.W. Kannenberg, Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I: A descriptive method of grouping genotypes, Can. J. Plant Sc. 58 (1978) 1029-1034.
  • 8SAS, SAS Institute User's Guide, Version 9, Cary, N.C., USA, 2003.
  • 9M, Ashraf, A.S. Qureshi, A. GhaFoor N.A. Khan, Genotype-environment interaction in wheat, Online J. of Biol. Sc. 5 (2001) 356-357.
  • 10A. Rashid, G.R. Hazara, N. Javed, M.S. Nawazx, G.M. Ali, Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis in mustard, Asian J. of Plant Sc. 1 (5) (2002) 591-592.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部