服务失败中群体消费者心理互动过程研究被引量：20

Research on group consumer's psychological interaction process under service failure setting

下载PDF

导出

摘要从研究国内外对于服务失败和补救的成果上看,均是对消费个体的研究,未见针对群体消费者在服务失败和补救中的心理与行为机制的研究.然而,服务行业的群体失败在我国已经呈现出逐年增多的现象,与个体失败相比,消费群体内部互动更加复杂多变,服务企业往往更加难于应对.通过真实场景实验,围绕去个体化理论和群体情绪感染理论系统探讨了服务失败后的群体心理反应过程.结果证实:服务失败群体中会产生群体情绪感染现象,同时也会激发消费者去个体化倾向,二者都会对消费者抱怨倾向产生作用. There has been abundant research on service failure and service recovery. Surprisingly, most of the papers are from an individual consumer perspective, and not a group consumer perspective. However, group consumer failures occur rapidly year by year in China. Compared with individual failure, interaction of group consumers is more complicated and more variable, so that it is more difficult for Service Corporation to cope with. By the use of real experiment, the authors discuss the impact of deindividuation and group emotional contagion on customer＇ s negative emotion under group service failure setting. Results indicate that both group emotional contagion and deindividuation effect both exists in group consumers and which will bring direct impact on customer＇s complaint intention.

作者杜建刚范秀成

机构地区南开大学商学院复旦大学管理学院

出处《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期60-70,共11页 Journal of Management Sciences in China

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(7087208370972044) 教育部人文社会科学资助项目(10YJA630099)

关键词去个体化群体情绪感染心理互动过程抱怨倾向 deindividuation group emotional contagion psychological interaction process complaint intention

分类号 F270.7 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献37

1Turner J C, Wetherell M S, Hogg M A. Referent informational influence and group polarization[ J ]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1989, 28(2): 135-147.
2Diener E, Lusk R, DeFour D, et al. Deindividuation : Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group membersimilarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior[ J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39 (3) : 449 -459.
3Festing L, Pepitone A, Newcomb T. Some consequences of de-individuation in a group[J].Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47(2) : 382 - 389.
4Zimbardo P G. The Human Choice : Individuation, Reason, and Order vs. Deindividuation, Impulse, and Chaos [ M ]//Arnold W J, Levine D. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1969:237 -307.
5Tajfel H, Turner J C. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior[ M ]//Worchel S, Austin W G. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago : Nelson-Hall. 1986 : 7 - 24.
6兰玉娟,佐斌.去个性化效应的社会认同模型[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):467-472. 被引量：31
7Diener E, Fraser S C, Beaman A L, et al. Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among halloween trick-ortreaters [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33(2) : 178 -183.
8Jorgenson D O, Dukes E O. Deindividuation as a function of density and group membership [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34( 1): 24-29.
9Maruyama G, Fraser S C, Miller N. Personal responsibility and altruism in children[ J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42 (4) : 658 - 664.
10Kugihara N. Effects of aggressive behavior and group size on collective escape in an emergency : a test between a social identity model and deindeivduation theory[ J]. British Journal of social psychology, 2001,40(4): 575 -598.

二级参考文献95

1席酉民,汪应洛,王刊良,杨民助.GDSS环境下群体大小的实验研究[J].决策与决策支持系统,1997(2):3-12. 被引量：10
2张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量：743
3李春,宫秀丽.自我分类理论概述[J].山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2006,51(3):157-160. 被引量：43
4古斯塔夫·黎朋.(1960).群众.见周晓虹(编).现代社会心理学名著菁华.pp.17-21.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
5Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
6Beaman, A., Klentz, B., Diener, E., & Svanum, S. (1979). Self-awareness and transgression in children: Two field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1835-1846.
7Brown, R. (2000). Social Identity Theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 745-778.
8Christopherson, K. (2007), The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Interact social interactions: "On the internet,nobody knows you're a dog". Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 3038-3056.
9Coffey, B., & Woolworth, S. (2004). Destroy the scum, and then neuter their families: The web forum as a vehicle for community discourse? The Social Science Journal, 41, 1-14.
10Diener, E. (1976). Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(5), 497-507.