摘要
目的比较小骨窗开颅术与颅骨钻孔引流术治疗高血压性脑出血的临床疗效。方法将98例高血压性脑出血患者按随机数字表法分为A、B两组，每组49例。A组采用小骨窗开颅术治疗，B组采用颅骨钻孔引流术治疗，比较两组的临床疗效。结果A组的近期总有效率为83．7％（41／49），明显高于B组的65．3％（32／49），两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。A组的远期良好率为55．1％（27／49），明显高于B组的26．5％（13／49），两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论小骨窗开颅术对高血压性脑出血进行治疗的近期疗效和远期疗效均优于颅骨钻孔引流术。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of small bone flap craniotony and skull drill drainage in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Ninety-eight patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage were classified into group A and group B by random number table with 49 eases in each. Group A was used small bone flap craniotony, and group B was used skull drill drainage. The clinical effects between two groups were compared. Results The short-term total effective rate in group A was 83.7% （41/49）, which was significantly higher than that in group B with 65.3%（ 32/49 ）（P 〈 0.05 ）. The long-term good rate in group A was 55.1%（27/49）,which was significantly higher than that in group B with 26.5%（13/49） （P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion Both the short-term and long-term effective rate of small bone flap craniotony for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage are better than skull drill drainage.
出处
《中国医师进修杂志》
2011年第35期8-10,共3页
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词
脑出血
小骨窗开颅术
颅骨钻孔引流术
Cerebral hemorrhage
Small bone flap eraniotony
Skull drill drainage perfusion
