期刊文献+

不同支架植入方式对小血管支架内再狭窄的影响 被引量:1

Effects of different implantation modes of drug-eluting stents on restenosis of small vessel lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察不同支架植入方式对小血管(血管直径≤2.75 mm)支架内再狭窄的影响。方法:对69(男51,女18)例患者共111处病变进行治疗,实验组(n=38)直接植入支架64枚(雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架53枚,紫杉醇药物洗脱支架11枚),对照组(n=31)预扩张后植入支架47枚(雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架41枚,紫杉醇药物洗脱支架6枚),两组患者术后即刻行冠脉血管内超声(IVUS)检测最小支架直径及横截面积。术后有胸闷胸痛症状患者即刻行冠脉造影术及IVUS,无症状患者6个月后复查。通过IVUS检测,对两组管腔丢失及支架内再狭窄率进行比较。结果:两组支架植入术后即刻最小支架直径实验组为(2.38±0.26)mm,对照组为(2.34±0.24)mm(P>0.05);支架横截面积实验组为(4.5±1.0)mm2,对照组为(4.3±0.9)mm2(P>0.05);6个月随访后复查两组管腔丢失,实验组为(1.44±0.30)mm,对照组为(0.98±0.24)mm(P=0.01);支架内再狭窄发生率实验组为15%;对照组为30%(P<0.05)。结论:对冠状动脉小血管病变患者直接药物洗脱支架植入组支架内再狭窄发生率低于预扩张后支架植入组。 AIM: To investigate the effects of different implantation modes of drug-eluting stents upon restenosis of small vessel lesions(diameter ≤2.75 mm).METHODS: Sixty-nine patients(51 males and 18 females) with 111 lesions were enrolled after implanting drug-eluting stents.The experimental group consisted of direct implantation of drug-eluting stents and the 64 stents included 53 rapamycin and 11 paclitaxel drug-eluting stents.The control group consisted of implanted drug-eluting stents after balloon predilation and the 47 stents included 41 rapamycin and six paclitaxel drug-eluting stents.After procedures,coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound(IVUS) were performed immediately in case of chest pain.For those without chest pain,coronary angiography and IVUS were performed after 6 months.In-stent restenosis was detected by IVUS and the rates of in-stent restenosis were compared between groups.RESULTS: The average diameters of small vessels immediately evaluated postoperatively in experimental group and control group were,respectively(2.38±0.26) mm and(2.34±0.24) mm(P0.05).The average cross-sectional areas of lumens of small vessels in experimental group and control group were,respectively,(0.26±0.30) mm2 and(4.3±0.9) mm2(P0.05).However,6 months postoperatively,the loss of lumens in experimental group and control group were(1.44±0.30) mm and(0.98±0.24) mm,respectively(P=0.01) and the ratios of in-stent restenosis were 14.60% and 29.78%,respectively(P0.05).CONCLUSION: For patients with small vessel lesions,direct implantation of drug-eluting stents is superior to implanting drug-eluting stents after balloon predilation.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2011年第6期786-789,共4页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 小血管 支架植入 预扩张 再狭窄 small vessel implantation drug-eluting stent balloon predilation: in-stent restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1XU Bo LI Jian-jun YANG Yue-jin MA Wei-hua CHEN Ji-lin QIAO Shu-bin QIN Xue-wen YAO Min LIU Hai-bo WU Yong-jian YUAN Jin-qing CHEN Jue YOU Shi-jie DAI Jun XIA Ran GAO Run-lin.A single center investigation of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis from 1633 consecutive Chinese Han ethnic patients[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(7):533-538. 被引量:23
  • 2Kastrati A,Schomig A,Dirschinger J,et al.A randomized trial comparing stenting with balloon angioplasty in small vessels in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease[].Circulation.2000
  • 3Hanekamp C,Koolen J,Bonnier H,Oldroyd K,de Boer MJ,Heublein B,et al.Randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus silicon carbon-coated stent implantation for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries[].The American Journal of Cardiology.2004
  • 4Koning R,Eltchaninoff H,Commeau P,Khalife K,Martine G,Janusz L,et al.BESMART(be stent in small arteries) trial in vestigators.stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for small coronary arteries: in-hospital and 6-month clinical and angiographic results[].Circulation.2001
  • 5Agostoni P,Biondi-Zoccai GG,Gasparini GL,et al.Isbare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty forsmall vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from ameta-analysis of randomized trials[].European Heart Journal.2005
  • 6Li J-J,Xu B,Yang Y-J,et al.Angiographic and clinicaloutcome for the treatment of in-stent restenosis withsirolimus-eluting stent compared to paclitaxel-eluting stent[].Chinese Medical Journal.2006
  • 7Morice,MC,Serruys,PW,Sousa,JE,Fajadet,J,Ban Hayashi,E,Perin,M,Colombo,A,Schuler,G,Barragan,P,Guagliumi,G,Molnar,F,Falotico,R.A randomized comparison of a sirolimuseluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization[].The New England Journal of Medicine.2002
  • 8Ortolani P,Ardissino D,Cavallini C,et al.Effect ofsirolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients with smallcoronary arteries (a SES-SMART substudy)[].American Journal of Chinese Medicine.2005
  • 9SCHOFER J,SCHLUTER M,GERSHLICK AH,WIJNS W,GARCIA E,SCHAMPAERT E,ET AL.SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS FOR TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH LONG ATHEROSCLEROTIC LESIONS IN SMALL CORONARY ARTERIES: DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL (E-SIRIUS)[].The Lancet.2003
  • 10Rodriguez-Granillo GA,Valgimigli M,Garcia-GarciaHM,et al.One-year clinical outcome after coronarystenting of very small vessels using 2.25 mm sirolimus-and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a comparison between theRESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries[].J InvasiveCardiol.2005

共引文献8

同被引文献23

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部