摘要
[目的]比较腕式电子血压计和水银血压计监测脑梗死病人血压方面是否存在差异,指导临床上监测脑梗死病人血压计的选择和使用。[方法]85例脑梗死病人,每例受试者用腕式血压计和水银血压计各进行1次平卧位血压测量并分组比较。[结果]腕式电子血压计和水银血压计监测收缩压、舒张压的差异均有统计学意义;脑栓塞和动脉硬化病人采用腕式电子血压计和水银血压计监测收缩压时存在差异,脑栓塞和脑血栓形成、有无动脉硬化病人采用腕式电子血压计和水银血压计监测舒张压时存在差异。[结论]腕式电子血压计不可用于脑梗死病人血压的监测。
Objective：To compare the differences between wrist electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer in blood pressure monitoring for patients with cerebral infarction,so as to guide the clinical selection and use of sphygmomanometer for cerebral infarction patients.Methods：A total of 85 cerebral infarction patients were taken as subjects,the supine blood pressure of each case was measured with wrist electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer at the same time and carrying out the group comparison.Results：There was statistical significant difference in systolic blood pressure monitoring and diastolic blood pressure monitoring between wrist electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer;there was statistical significant difference in systolic blood pressure monitoring for cerebral embolism patients and atherosclerosis patients between by using wrist electronic sphygmomanometer and the mercury sphygmomanometer;there was statistical significant difference in monitoring diastolic pressure for cerebral embolism patients and cerebral thrombosis patients,with or without arteriosclerosis patients between using wrist electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer.Conclusion：Electronic sphygmomanometer can not be used for blood pressure monitoring of cerebral infarction patients.
出处
《护理研究（上旬版）》
2011年第12期3140-3143,共4页
Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词
脑梗死
血压
腕式电子血压计
水银血压计
cerebral infarction
blood pressure
wrist electronic sphygmomanometer
mercury sphygmomanometer
