期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择 被引量:17

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式及对母婴结局的影响。方法:对86例剖宫产术后再次妊娠产妇的分娩方式、分娩结局及母婴并发症进行回顾性分析。其中再次剖宫产(RCS)56例,剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)30例;并随机抽取同期首次剖宫产(PCS)60例,非瘢痕子宫阴道分娩(VBNC)50例进行对照。结果:①86例剖宫产术后再次妊娠者38例阴道试产,其中30例试产成功,占34.9%,再次剖宫产56例,占65.1%;②VBAC组产后24h出血量、术后发热、新生儿窒息和住院天数均比RCS组明显减少(P<0.05);③VBAC组产后24h出血量、术后发热、新生儿窒息率、先兆子宫破裂发生率与VBNC相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);④RCS组产后24h出血量较PCS组明显增多(P<0.001),其余指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩,阴道分娩与剖宫产相比利多弊少,符合阴道试产条件者,严密监护下阴道试产是安全可行的。
出处 《广西医科大学学报》 CAS 2011年第5期752-754,共3页 Journal of Guangxi Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献19

  • 1高鹰.疤痕子宫再次妊娠136例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(3):333-334. 被引量:22
  • 2吕秀丽.剖宫产术后再次妊娠产科处理246例临床分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(8):639-639. 被引量:7
  • 3Chaoman K. The value of serial uhrasounds in the management of recurrent Uterine scar rupture [ J]. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 101 (6) :549-550.
  • 4Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation flower uterine segment thickness inpatients of previous cesarean section [ J ]. Gynecol Obstet ,2004,87 ( 3 ) :215-219.
  • 5Hasbargen U, Margarita SM, Peter H, et al. Uterine dehiscence in a nullipara,diagnosed by MRI ,following use of unipolar elect rocautery during laparoscopic myomectomy : Case report[J]. Human Reproduction,2002,17 : 2180-2182.
  • 6Pare E, Quinones JN, Macones GA, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean section : assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes[ J ]. BJOG, 2006,113 : 75 -85.
  • 7Martel MJ,Mackinnon CJ. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth [ J ].J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005,27 : 164 - 188.
  • 8Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 ( Replaces guideline Number 147 ), February 2005 [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005,89 ( 3 ) : 319-331.
  • 9Adanu RM ,McCarthy MY. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in theWest African setting [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2007,98 (3) : 2272-2311.
  • 10Kwee A,Bots ML, Visser GH, et al. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands [ J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2007,132(2) :171-176.

共引文献218

同被引文献116

  • 1陈桂林.剖宫产后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的临床研究[J].河南外科学杂志,2010,16(3):5-7. 被引量:11
  • 2侯丽勤.330例剖宫产术后再次妊娠孕妇分娩方式及结局分析[J].妇产与遗传(电子版),2014,4(1):30-32. 被引量:8
  • 3Schifrin BS,Cohen WR.The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section[J].Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2013,27(2):269-283.
  • 4Cohain JS.Vaginal births after C-section are not necessarily riskier in a birth center than in the hospital[J].Midwifery Today Int Midwife,2006,2(77):16-17,60.
  • 5Lin N,Li X,Song T,et al. The effect of collagen-binding vascular endothelial growth factor on the remodeling of scarred rat uterus following full-thickness injury[J]. Bio- materials, 2012,33 (6) : 1801-1807.
  • 6Cogan A,Barlow P,Benati N,et al. An audit about Labour induction,using prostaglandin, in women with a scarred uterus[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2012,286 (6):~ 1399- 1406.
  • 7Baron J, Weintraub A Y, Eshkoli T, et al. The consequences of previous uterine scar dehiscence and cesarean delivery on subsequent births [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2014,126 ( 2 ) : 120-122.
  • 8Yasmin S, Sadaf J, Fatima N. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment[ J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2011,21 (9) :522-526.
  • 9Moshiri M, Osman S, Bhargava P,et al.Imaging Evaluation of Maternal CompLications Associated with Repeat Cesarean Deliveries[J].Radiol Clin North Am,20t4,52(5):1117-1135.
  • 10Liberty G, Hyman J, Friedler S,et al.High rates of abnormalities in hysterosalpingography in couples with male factor infertility[J].Clin Exp Obstet Gyneeol,2014,41(4):415-418.

引证文献17

二级引证文献208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部