期刊文献+

实时心肌超声造影微泡再充盈参数评价心肌梗死患者心肌灌注 被引量:4

Assessment of myocardial perfusion by the microbubble replenishment parameters of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 应用实时心肌超声造影分析收缩末期与舒张末期再充盈参数,探讨其评价心肌梗死患者心肌微循环灌注的可行性.方法 对21例陈旧性心肌梗死及急性心肌梗死亚急性期的患者及6例正常对照组进行实时心肌超声造影.用时间强度曲线分析左室各节段收缩末期及舒张末期的微气泡再充盈过程.根据灌注的函数公式y(t)=A[1 - e-kt]+B,脱机心电图触发方式选择收缩末期(T波结束)帧和舒张末期(R波顶点)帧分别执行灌注曲线拟合,得到微气泡信号强度增加的高度(A值)、信号强度增加的速率(k值)并计算A×k值,比较收缩末期与舒张末期相应节段心肌血容量、心肌血流速度、心肌血流量的差异.结果 正常对照组中收缩末期的A值、k值及A×k值均小于舒张末期各值,差异有统计学意义[分别为(6.21±2.69)dB对(7.93±3.66)dB,P<0.05;0.36±0.15对0.42±0.19,P<0.01;2.88±1.29对3.39±1.61,P<0.05].与收缩末期相比,舒张末期A值,k值及A×k值具有更大的变异性(变异系数分别为A值46.2%对43.3%,k值45.2%对41.4%,A×k值47.5%对44.8%,P值均<0.05).病例组中梗死相关冠状动脉供血节段心肌的收缩末期再充盈参数明显小于非梗死冠状动脉供血心肌各参数值,差异有统计学意义[A值、k值及A×k值分别为(3.99±1.02) dB对(4.77±1.24)dB,P<0.05;0.31±0.13对0.35±0.16,P<0.05;1.25±0.74对2.39±1.11,P<0.01].结论 收缩末期与舒张末期再充盈参数可以评价心肌微循环灌注,收缩末期各参数值具有更小的变异性,其中收缩末期k值是一个较好的评价指标.然而,显著的变异性提示这些指标适用于自身前后对照研究. Objective To assess myocardial perfusion by the end-systolic and end-diastolic replenishment parameters of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE).Methods Twenty-one patients with myocardial infarction(MI) and normal control group of 6 cases underwent intravenous realtime myocardial contrast echocardiography via slow and homogeneous venous injections of SonoVue.MCE images were obtained from the apical 4-chamber,2-chamber,and long-axis views.According to the exponential function:y(t) =A [1 - e-kt] + B,the time intensity curves were obtained.By an off-line ECG triggering and curve fitting,the replenishment parameters A value,k value,A × k value were obtained separately from end-systolic and end-diastolic images.Results In normal control group,the end-systolic replenishment parameters A value,k value,A × k value were all lower than that of the end-diastolic replenishment parameters[(6.21 ± 2.69)dB vs (7.93 ± 3.66)dB,P 〈0.05;0.36 ± 0.15 vs 0.42 ± 0.19,P 〈 0.01 ;2.88 ± 1.29 vs 3.39 ± 1.61,P 〈0.05,respectively].The end-diastolic replenishment parameters were found significantly greater variability than the end-systolic values (variation coefficient CV:A value 46.2% vs 43.3%,k value 45.2% vs 41.4%,A× k value 47.5% vs 44.8%,all P 〈0.05).In 21 patients,the end-systolic replenishment parameters in myocardial segments supplied by infarct-related coronary artery were significantly lower than that in myocardial segments supplied by non - infarct - related coronary artery.Conclusions The end-systolic and end-diastolic replenishment parameters of real time myocardial contrast echocardiography can assess myocardial perfusion.The variability of the end-systolic replenishment parameters is smaller than that of the end diastolic parameters.Significant variability in k-value suggests that this parameter is best suited for before-after study in the same patient.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1021-1024,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
关键词 超声心动描记术 心肌梗死 心肌再灌注 Echocardiography Myocardial infarction Myocardial reperfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1The TIMI Study Group.The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial:phase Ⅰ findings.N Engl J Med,1985,312:932-936.
  • 2黎鹏,邓又斌,杨好意,王红英,魏翔,张清阳,毕小军,申屠伟慧,黎春蕾,白姣.实时心肌超声造影评价冠状动脉搭桥术前后心肌灌注[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2007,16(4):294-297. 被引量:10
  • 3Wei K,Jayaweera AR,Firoozan S,et al.Quantification of MBF flow with ultrasound induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.Circulation,1998,97:473-483.
  • 4Masugata H,Lafitte S,Peters B,et al.Comparison of real-time and intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography for quantification of coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient.Circulation,2001,104:1550-1556.
  • 5Levine RA,Teichholz LE,Goldman ME,et al.Microbubbles have intracardiac velocities similar to those of red blood cells.J Am Coll Cardiol,1984,3:28-33.
  • 6Malm S,Frigstad S,Helland F,et al.Quantification of resting myocardial blood flow velocity in normal humans using real-time contrast echocardiography.A feasibility study.Cardiovasc Ultrasound,2005,3:16.

二级参考文献14

  • 1舒先红,潘翠珍,郭士遵,董丽莉,阮雯,李延林,葛均波,陈灏珠.多巴酚丁胺负荷超声和实时声学造影评价介入治疗术后心肌灌注[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2005,14(6):428-432. 被引量:3
  • 2邓又斌 王新房 王加恩.双氧水心肌灌注声学造影法的实验研究[J].中华物理医学杂志,1987,9:217-219.
  • 3DeMaria AN, Bommer WJ, Riggs K, et al. Ehocardiographic visualization of myocardial perfusion by left heart and intracoronary injections of echocontrast agents. Circulation, 1980,62 (Suppl Ⅱ):143.
  • 4Kaul S,Villanueva F. Is the determination of myocardial perfusion necessary to evaluate the success of reperfusion when the infarctrelated artery is open? Circulation, 1992,85 : 1942-1944.
  • 5Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.Circulation, 1998,97: 473-483.
  • 6Firschke C, Camarano G, Lindner JR, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging in the setting of coronary artery stenosis and acute myocardial infarction using venous injection of FS-069, a second generation echocardiographic contrast agent. Circulation, 1997,96:959-967.
  • 7Korosoglou G, Labadze N, Hansen A,et al. Usefulness of real-time myocardial perfusion imaging in the evaluation of patients with first time chest pain. Am J Cardiol, 2004,94 : 1225-1231.
  • 8Aggeli C, Bonou M,Stefanadis C. Potential clinical applications of myocardial contrast echocardiography in evaluating myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiology, 2005,104:1-9.
  • 9Shimoni S, Frangogiannis NG, Aggeli CJ, et al. Identification of hibernating myocardium with quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography : comparison with dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy. Circulation, 2003,107 : 538-544.
  • 10Muro T, Hozumi T, Watanabe H, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging:comparison with positron emission tomography. Heart, 2003,89:145-149.

共引文献9

同被引文献68

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部