期刊文献+

论精密单点定位整周模糊度解算的不同策略 被引量:21

On the Different Strategies for Integer Ambiguity Resolution in Precise Point Positioning
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于GPS非差相位观测值的相位偏差(initial phase biases,IPB)与整周模糊度难以分离,精密单点定位(PPP)估值均为模糊度浮点解。首先对GPS原始观测方程的秩亏问题进行分析,从参数整合的角度,推导卫星IPB估计的满秩函数模型,形成一种新的PPP-AR算法。以此为基础,对已有两种算法的特点进行对比分析。研究表明,分解法是一种观测信息的最优利用,且与传统的星钟估计方法具有一致性,但未发掘卫星IPB较为稳定的有利约束;非整法对所采用的组合观测值之间的相关性未加考虑,是一种次优估计,实时性较差,且较依赖于高精度的码观测。推导的新算法可有效克服已有算法的不足,便于施加部分参数的合理时变性约束,提高卫星IPB估计的可靠性。 Due to the inseparability between the initial phase biases (IPB) and the integer ambiguities in undifferenced (UD) GPS carrier phase observable, the solutions from precise point positioning (PPP) are always ambiguity-float. The rank-defect UDGPSobservationequation is firstly investigated, and the full-rank mathematical model for satellite IPB estimation is derived by means of re-parameterization, thus forming a new strategy for PPP- AR. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of both existing methods is subsequently conducted based on the derived re-parameterized equations. It is concluded from the analysis that full utilization of information from GPS observations is guaranteed in DSC method. The process of generating DSC is consistent with the standard satellite clocks estimation. However, the stable temporal behaviors of satellite IPB are net reasonably exploited. In contrast, the FPB method doesn't fully account for the mathematical correlations between the adopted linear combinations of GPS observations, which would result in a sub-optimal satellite IPB. Additionally, the real-time implementation of this method is more troublesome than the DSC, and the GPS code observations with high accuracy are always required. The newly presented strategy here can avoid the shortcomings in both current methods, and reasonable constraints that are converted from the temporal stability of several unknowns can be easily imposed upon the parameter estimation to lead to more reliable satellite IPB.
出处 《测绘学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期710-716,共7页 Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(40874009 41074013) 国家杰出青年科学基金(40625013) 中国科学院研究生科技创新与社会实践资助专项
关键词 整周模糊度解算 精密单点定位 相位观测值 估计方法 组合观测值 相位偏差 观测方程 函数模型 precise point positioning (PPP) initial phase biases (IPB) PPP ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) decoupled satellite clocks (DSC) fractional phase biases (FPB)
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1ZUMBERGE J, HEFLIN M, JEFFERSON D, et al. Precise Point Positioning for the Efficient and Robust Analysis of GPS Data from Large Networks[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(B3): 5005-5017.
  • 2张宝成,欧吉坤,袁运斌,钟世明.基于GPS双频原始观测值的精密单点定位算法及应用[J].测绘学报,2010,39(5):478-483. 被引量:87
  • 3BLEWITT G. Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for the Global Positioning System Applied to Geodetic Baselines up to 2000 km[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94 (B8) : 10187-10203.
  • 4张小红,李星星,郭斐,李盼,王磊.基于服务系统的实时精密单点定位技术及应用研究[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(6):1308-1314. 被引量:50
  • 5BERTIGER W, DESAI S D, HAINES B, et al. Single Receiver Phase Ambiguity Resolution with GPS Data[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84(5) :327-337.
  • 6COLLINS P, BISNATH S, LAHAYE F, et al. Undiffer enced GPS Ambiguity Resolution Using the Decoupled Clock Model and Ambiguity Datum Fixing[J]. Navigation, 2010, 57(2): 123-135.
  • 7GE M, GENDT G, ROTHACHER M, et al. Resolution of GPS Carrier-phase Ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with Daily Observations[J]. Journal of Geodesy,2008, 82(7): 389-399.
  • 8GENG J, TEFERLE F N, SHI C, et al. Ambiguity Reso lution in Precise Point Positioning with Hourly Data[J]. GPS Solutions, 2009, 13(4):263-270.
  • 9GENG J, TEFERLE F N, MENG X, et al. Kinematic Precise Point Positioning at Remote Marine Platforms[J]. GPS Solutions, 2009, 14(4): 343-350.
  • 10GENG J, MENG X, DODSON A H, et al. Integer Ambi guity Resolution in Precise Point Positioning: Method Comparison[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84(9):569-581.

二级参考文献43

  • 1冯林刚,赵永贵.星基差分GPS——StarFire系统[J].测绘通报,2006(11):6-8. 被引量:13
  • 2YUAN Yunbin,HUO Xingliang,OU Jikun.Models and methods for precise determination of ionospheric delay using GPS[J].Progress in Natural Science:Materials International,2007,17(2):187-196. 被引量:25
  • 3Bisnath S, Gao Y. Current State of Precise Point Positioning and Future Prospects and Limitations [C]. International Association of Geodesy Symposia 133, Perugia, Italy, 2007.
  • 4Zhang Xiaohong, Li Xinging. The Prototype system Realization of Real Time Precise Point Positio ning and Its Precision Analysis[C]. CPGPS, Beijing, 2009.
  • 5Gabor M J, Nerem R S. GPS Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution Using Satellite-Satellite Single Difference[C]. The 12th Int. Tech. Meet. Satellite Div. Inst. Navigation GPS, Nashville,TN, 1999.
  • 6Ge Maorong, Gendt G, Rothacher M, et al. Resolution of GPS Carrier-Phase Ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with Daily Observations [J]. J Geod, 2007,82(7) :389-399.
  • 7Laurichesse D, Mercier F. Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and Its Application to PPP[C]. The 20th Int. Tech. Meet. Satellite Div. Inst. Navigation GNSS, Fort Worth, TX, 2007.
  • 8Collins P, Lahaye F, H rous P, et al. Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution Using the Decoupled Clock Model[C]. ION GNSS 2008,GA, USA, 2008.
  • 9Teunissen P J G. A New Method for Fast Carrier Phase Ambiguity Estimation [C]. IEEE Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, Las Vegas, NV, 1994.
  • 10Teunissen P J G, Kleusberg A. GPS for Geodesy [J]. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, 1996,60: 175-217.

共引文献258

同被引文献156

引证文献21

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部