摘要
对于司法过程中的事实问题,始终存在着多种分类。大多数都是在静态意义上对事实进行划分;事实只有在司法过程中才有意义,事实需要在司法过程中进行动态的考察。从客观事实的发生、案件事实的陈述到裁判事实的建构,是诉讼参与人、法律规范、证据等各种因素整合的结果。裁判事实的最终形成是在法律理性主导下进行的事实演化;事实的形成是一个动态的过程,静态意义上的分类并不是司法过程中事实的真实形态。
There are various classifications on facts in judicial proceedings,most of which focus on static divisions.However,only in dynamic judicial proceedings will facts be meaningful.It is rather an integral result of factors made by parties concerned,legal norms and evidence in such a construction process from occurrence of facts,statements of facts to trial facts.The final formation of trial facts is evolution of facts carried out under the guideline of legal rationality.Such formation is a dynamic process and the former static classification cannot cover the real form of facts in judicial proceedings.
出处
《北方法学》
2011年第6期15-23,共9页
Northern Legal Science
基金
山东省社会科学规划研究项目"司法视野下的私法自治研究"(项目编号09CFXZ20)的阶段性成果
