期刊文献+

后腹腔镜下离断式肾盂成形术(附19例报告)

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价后腹腔镜下离断式肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的临床疗效及其可行性。方法采用后腹腔镜下离断式肾盂成形术对19例诊断为动力性梗阻的肾盂输尿管连接部(UPJ)狭窄患者(不包括因外在纤维索及异位血管压迫所致者)进行治疗。结果 19例手术均获成功,无1例中转改开放手术,平均手术时间165min(125~245min);出血量78mL(55~165mL),均无输血。术后平均住院时间7.5d。2例出现尿漏,分别于术后11、12d消失。术后随访6~36个月(平均26个月),IVP检查UPJ吻合口未见狭窄,手术侧肾盂积水明显减轻或基本消失(中度积水3例、轻度积水5例、肾积水消失11例)。结论后腹腔镜下离断式肾盂成形术具有术中创伤小、术后恢复快、疼痛减轻的优点,效果优于开放手术,是既安全又有效的微创手术方法。
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期1213-1215,共3页 China Journal of Endoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1KAJBAFZADEH AM, PAYABVASH S, SALMASI AH, et al. Smooth muscle cell apoptosis and defective neural development in congenital uretetopelvic junction obstruction [J]. J Urol, 2006, 176(2): 718-723.
  • 2O'REILLY PH, BROOMAN PJ, MAK S, et al. The long-term tvsults of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty[J]. BJU Int, 2001, 87(4): 287-289.
  • 3BERNADO N, SMITH AD. Endopyelotomy review [J]. Arch Esp Urol, 1999, 52: 541-548.
  • 4祖雄兵,庄乾元,叶章群,周四维,齐琳,申鹏飞.钬激光腔内治疗输尿管肾盂连接处狭窄[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(12):1255-1256. 被引量:16
  • 5LOPEZ-PUJALS A, LEVEILLEE P,J, WONG C. Application of strict radiolngie erlteria to define success in laparoseopie pyelo- plasty[J]. J Endourol, 2004, 18(8): 756-760.
  • 6MUNVER R, SOSA RE, DEL PIZZO JJ. Laparoseopie pyeloplas- ty:history, evolution and future [J]. J Endourol, 2004, 18(8): 748-755.
  • 7CALVERT RC, MORSY MM, ZELHOF B, et al. Comparison of laparoseopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction [J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(2): 411-414.
  • 8张旭,李宏召,马鑫,陈忠,郭小林,王少刚,李龙承,叶章群.后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术(附22例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2003,18(12):707-708. 被引量:66
  • 9RASSWEILER J, FREDE T, HENKEL TO, et al. Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperi- toneal laparoscopic versus the open approach [J]. Eur Urol, 1998, 33(5): 489-496.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]O'Reilly P H, Brooman P J, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int, 2001, 87:287-289.
  • 2[2]Cohen T D, Gross M B, Preminger G M. Long-term follow-up of Acucise incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral stricture. Urology, 1996, 47:317-323.
  • 3[3]Danuser H, Ackermann D K, Bohlen D. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol, 1998, 159:56-61.
  • 4[4]Gupta M, Tuncay O L, Smith A. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: A 12-year experience. J Urol, 1997, 157:1613-1619.
  • 5[5]Bernado N, Smith A D. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol, 1999, 52:541-548.
  • 6[6]Turk I A, Davis J W, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol, 2002, 42:268-275.
  • 7[7]Jarrett T W, Chan D Y, Charambura T C, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol, 2002, 167:1253-1256.
  • 8[8]Eden C G, Cahill D, Allen J D. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int, 2001, 88:526-531.
  • 9[9]Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard J J, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol, 2001, 166:48-50.
  • 10[10]Ben Slama M R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience in 15 cases. Urology, 2000, 56:45-48.

共引文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部