技术范式变革环境下组织的战略适应性被引量：10

Strategic Flexibility in a Dynamic Technological Regime

导出

摘要技术范式作为组织的外部环境因素之一,是推动组织战略变革的重要因素。在技术变革加速的时代,把握行业技术范式的变革对组织的生存和发展具有重要战略意义。技术范式变革会引起组织外部竞争环境的变化,因此,认识技术范式变革的动力机制以及演化规律,了解技术范式"技术性"和"竞争性"的双重含义,对于组织如何调整其目标市场、组织能力、组织制度和组织边界,制定与外部环境相适应的发展战略,具有重要的现实意义。 As a crucial dimension in tile outer environment oi an organization, the evolution of technological re- gime incurs the adjustments on the organizational strategies. In a time of technology characterized by accelerating changes, the evolution in technological regime is crucial to the survival and development of an organization. The underst and ing on the motives mechanism, the evolution rules, and the two-dimension characteristics as ＂teehno- logicalness＂ and ＂competitiveness＂ of technological regime bear great realistic importance on the organizational strategies on the market segments, organizational boundary, capacities, and the rules and procedures.

作者罗仲伟卢彬彬

机构地区中国社会科学院工业经济研究所中国社会科学院研究生院

出处《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期33-42,共10页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )

关键词技术范式目标市场:组织边界:战略适应性 technological regime market segments organizational bounda.ry adaptability of strategy

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献36

1A. K. Klevorick, R. C. Levin, R. R. Nelson & S. G. Winter. On the Sources and Significance of Industry Differences in Tech- nological Opportunities [ J ]. Research Policy, 1995, (24) : 185 - 205.
2Bower J.L. & Christensen, C.M. Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, (17) : 197 -218.
3C. M. Christensen & Richard S. Rosenbloom. Explain the Attacker's Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network[J]. Research Policy, 1995, (24) : 233 -257.
4C. M. Christensen. Exploring the Limits of the Technology S-curve[ J]. Product and Operations Management, 1992, (fall) : 334 - 366.
5David. J. Teece. Profiting from Technological Innovation : Implication for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy[J]. Research Policy, 1986, (15) : 285 - 305.
6Eisenhardt K. M. & Martin J.A. Dynamic capabilities: What are They? [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, (21) : 1105 - 1121.
7F. F. Suarez & James Utterback. Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, (16): 415 -430.
8F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo, R. Nelson & S. Winter ( 1 ). Public Policies and Changing boundaries of Firms in a "history- friendly" Model of the Co-evolution of the Computer and Semiconductor Industry [ J 1, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008a, (67) : 355 -380.
9F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo, R. Nelson & S. Winter(2). Vertical Integration and Disintegration of Computer Firms: a "history- friendly" Model of the Co-evolution of the Computer and Semiconductor Industry[ J ]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2008b, 17, (2) : 197 - 231.
10Givanni Dosi. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: a Suggested Interpretion of the Determinants and Di- rections of Technical Change [ J ].Research Policy, 1982, ( 11 ) : 147 - 162.

二级参考文献17

1Williamson,O.E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M].Free Press:New York,1985.
2乔治·戴,保罗·休梅克.沃顿轮新兴技术管理[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002.
3Abemathy,W.J.,and Clark,K.B.Innovation:Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction[J].Research Policy,1985,(14).
4Anderson,P.,and Tushman,M.Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs:A Cyclical Model of Technological Change[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(4).
5Christensen,C.M.,and Rosenbloom,R.S.Explaining the Attacker's Advantage:Technological Paradigms,Organizational Dynamics,and the Value Network[J].Research Policy,1995,(24).
6Dyer,J.H.,and Singh,H.The Relational View:Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,1998,(23).
7Fisher,J.,and R.Pry.A Simple Substitution Model of Technological Change[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1971,(3).
8Frank T.Rothaermel.Complementary Assets,Strategic Alliances,and the Incumbent's Advantage:An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry[J].Research Policy,2001,(30).
9Levitt,Theodore.Marketing Myopia[J].Harvard Business Review,1960,38(4).
10Lieberman,M.B,and Montgomery,D.B.First-mover Advantages[J].Strategic Management Journal,Summer Special Issue,1988,(9).