期刊文献+

工序贸易及其影响效应——一个基于工序分工的贸易模型及其政策含义 被引量:7

Task Trade and its Influence Effects:A Task Trade Model with its Policy Implications
原文传递
导出
摘要 工序贸易的不断扩大和国际企业生产总部向发展中国家的转移,在给发展中国家创造出更多劳动密集型就业机会的同时,也导致某些发展中国家被锁定在"比较优势陷阱"中。发展中国家的对外贸易战略应建立在动态比较优势的基础之上,以技术进步和制度创新为驱动力,以产业结构升级为目标,将现有的比较优势通过逐步积累和有序释放而转化为未来的竞争优势,确立具有可持续发展的动态比较优势产业或领域。另外,在工序分工的背景下,将贸易政策在特定领域的调整对象由最终产品改为"生产工序",会更能体现贸易政策的调节功能,并有助于提高国家在国际分工体系中的位置。 While creating more labor-intensive jobs for developing countries, the growth of the task trade between developed countries and developing countries and the transfer of production headquarters of transnational corporations to developing countries have also brought some developing countries into "the trap of comparative advantage" . The foreign trade strategy of developing countries should be based on their dynamic comparative advantages, regarding institutional change and technical progress as their main driving power and the improvement of industrial structures as their main target. Industries of dynamic comparative advantage with strategic importance should be set up through the accumulation of comparative advantage from trade and the scientific allocation of resources. In addition, the model suggests that the trade policy should target on tasks instead of finished products, which will more effectively reveal the intention of the policy and help improve the position of the country in international labor division system.
作者 梁碧波
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期4-12,共9页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 教育部人文社科规划基金项目(10YJA790105)
关键词 技术进步 制度变迁 产品内分工 工序分工 工序贸易 technical progress institutional change intra-product division of labor task division of labor task
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈昊.中国对外贸易是否面临比较优势陷阱风险:理论分析与经验证据[J].南京财经大学学报,2010(4):19-25. 被引量:6
  • 2李辉文.现代比较优势理论的动态性质——兼评“比较优势陷阱”[J].经济评论,2004(1):42-47. 被引量:65
  • 3李义平.比较优势与比较优势陷阱[N].人民日报,2006-04-19.
  • 4卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004,4(1):55-82. 被引量:245
  • 5Deardorff, Alan V. 2001.Fragmentation across Cones [C].In Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy, ed.Sven W. Arndt and Henryk Kierzkowski,35-51.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • 6Deardorff, Alan V. 2001.Fragmentation In Simple Trade Models [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance (2):121-137.
  • 7Egger, Hartmut and Jose Falkinger. 2003.The Distribution Effects of International Outsourcing in a 2x2Production Model[J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(2):189-206.
  • 8Feenstra,Robert C. and Gorden H.Hanson. 1996.Forfeign Investment, Outsourcing, and Relative Wages[C]. In the Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati,ed.Robert C. Feentra, GeneM. Grossman, and Douglas A. Irwin,89-127. Cambriege,MA:MIT Press,.
  • 9Grossman Gene M. and Esteban ossi-Hansberg. 2010.Trading Task between Similar Countries[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14554,.
  • 10Grossman, Gene M. and Esteban ossi-Hansberg. 2006.The Rise of Offshoring: It's not Wine for Cloth Anymore[R].Proceedings, 59-102.Ferderal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,.

二级参考文献39

  • 1彼得.沃尔,王耀中,肖筱娟.论比较优势与竞争优势[J].国外财经,1995(2):22-31. 被引量:9
  • 2陈立中.比较优势与“比较优势陷阱”——基于一种数学视角和经验性解释[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2005(4):15-19. 被引量:10
  • 3袁欣.加工贸易与比较优势陷阱:来自广东的实证分析[J].宏观经济研究,2005(9):58-60. 被引量:13
  • 4Michael Sattinger. Comparative Advantage in Individuals [ J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1978, 60(2) : 259 -267.
  • 5A. Thomas King, Peter Mieszkowski. Racial Discrimination, Segregation, and The Price of Housing[ J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1973,81 (3) : 590 -606.
  • 6Ann Dougherty, Robert Van Order. Inflation, Housing Costs, and the consumer Price Index[J].The American Economic Review, 1982, 72( 1 ) : 154 - 164.
  • 7Daniel Tsiddon. The Behavior of the Aggregate Price Level[ J ]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1993, 60 (4) : 889 -902.
  • 8Eric A. Hanushek, John M. Quiqley. What is the Price Elasticity of Housing Demand [ J ]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1980, 62 ( 3 ) : 449 - 454.
  • 9Eyal Biyalogorsky,Eitan Gerstner. Continqent Pricing to Reduce Price Risks [J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23 (1): 146-155.
  • 10Daniel M. Bernhofen, John C. Brown. An Empirical Assessment of the Comparative Advantage Gains from Trade: Evidence from Japan [ J ]. The American Economic Review,2005, 95( 1 ) : 208 - 225.

共引文献315

同被引文献38

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部