摘要
因为《侵权责任法》第58条既存在表述上的瑕疵,也存在内容上的错误,所以,不能用单纯的可推翻的推定或不可推翻的推定进行解释,必须对条文进行修改。修改前应作以下解释:如果原告证明了被告违反法律、行政法规、规章以及其他有关诊疗规范的规定,则法院直接认定医疗机构存在过错;如果原告证明了被告"隐匿或者拒绝提供与纠纷有关的病历资料"或"伪造、篡改或者销毁病历资料",则推定医疗机构存在过错,如果医疗机构不能证明自己不存在过错,则承担医疗侵权责任。
As there are not only flaws in wording but also mistakes in content in Article 58 of Tort Liability Law,it can not simply be explained by a rebuttable presumption or irrebuttable presumption.The provisions must be revised and it can be interpreted as the following before being revised： If the plaintiff proves that the defendant violates the laws,administrative regulations,rules and other provisions of the diagnostic practices,the court will conclude directly that it is the fault of medical institutions.If the plaintiff proves that the defendant ＂conceals or refuses to provide dispute-related medical records＂ or ＂forges,alters or destroys medical records＂,it is presumed that the fault lies with medical institutions.If medical institutions can not prove that it is not their own fault,they are supposed to take the medical tort liability.
出处
《孝感学院学报》
2011年第6期29-34,共6页
JOURNAL OF XIAOGAN UNIVERSITY
关键词
过错
推定
视为
可推翻的推定
不可推翻的推定
fault
presumption
regard as
rebuttable presumption
irrebuttable presumption
