期刊文献+

基于资源价值折耗的石油资源账户建立与分析——以黄河三角洲石油开发为例 被引量:3

Design and Analysis of Oil Resources Accounts Based on Resources Value Depletion:Taking Oil Industry Development of the Yellow River Delta as an Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 在国际上通行的环境经济综合核算体系(SEEA)的基础上,以黄河三角洲石油资源开发为研究案例,根据黄河三角洲2003—2008年石油开发利用等数据,经过计算和统计依次建立了石油资源的实物型账户、价值型账户和综合账户。计算和统计结果表明:2003—2008年,黄河三角洲石油资源因开采而造成的价值折耗分别为154.0×108、111.3×108、121.6×108、104.9×108、106.0×108、83.0×108元,考虑了资源价值折耗的石油行业增加值占工业增加值和地区GDP的比例,以及因价值折耗造成的工业经济和地区GDP损失比例都有减小的趋势,平均分别为59.1%和42.0%,以及14.3%和9.8%。巨大的价值折耗带来了石油资源利用的可持续性下降,但是在当地的整体经济中,黄河三角洲石油开发带来的经济增长的可持续性在一定程度上增强。最后对结果进行了分析和讨论。 Based on the concise introduction of the system of integrated environmental and economic accounting(SEEA) proposed by United Nations,the oil development in the Yellow River Delta was studied to explain the compiling procedure of oil resources accounts with oil exploration and refining data from 2003 to 2008.Oil resources accounts include physical account,monetary account and integrated account in this paper.The results show that,in the Yellow River Delta from 2003 to 2008,value depletion of oil resources for exploration estimated by applying "user cost approach" are 15.40 billion yuan,11.13 billion yuan,12.16 billion yuan,10.49 billion yuan,10.60 billion yuan,8.30 billion yuan,respectively.Then the adjusted indicators of production by subtracting depletion are less than traditional indicators.Meanwhile according to the integrated account,the ratio of oil industry added value with deduction of depletion to industry added value and local GDP(changes from 80% to 40% and 50% to 30%),and loss percentage of industry GDP and local GDP for depletion(changes from 20% to 5% and 30% to 6%) have reduction tendency during the years from 2003 to 2008.Additionally,the average results are 59.1% and 42.0%,14.3% and 9.8% within the study years,respectively.From this perspective,although poor sustainability of oil resources utilization can be found by huge depletion value for exploration,it is also revealed that sustainability of local entire economic growth brought about by oil industrial development in the Yellow River Delta is enhanced to some extent.And finally the results are analyzed and discussed.
出处 《自然资源学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期1953-1962,共10页 Journal of Natural Resources
基金 山东省科技发展计划项目(2009GG10005001) 908专项(908-02-03-03) 教育部新世纪优秀人才计划基金(NCET-08-0508)
关键词 环境经济核算 石油资源账户 价值折耗 使用者成本法 integrated environmental and economic accounting oil resources accounts value depletion user cost approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1世界资源研究所 联合国环境规划署 联合国开发计划署 等.世界资源报告(1998-1999)[R].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.30.
  • 2Boon P J Calow P Petts G E 宁远译.河流保护与管理[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1997.260-270.
  • 3Costanza R, D'arge R, Rudolf D G, et al. The value of world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253 - 360.
  • 4UNSD. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting[ R]. New York: United Nations, 1993.20- 30.
  • 5United Nations. Basic structure of the SEEA[J/OL]. http://esa.un. org/unsd/sna1993/Tables.
  • 6UNSD, UNEP. Integrated environmental and economic accounting: an operational manual[R]. New York. United Nations, 1999.44- 85.
  • 7Young M. Water fights: an ecological economics perspective[ J/OL]. http://cres. anu. edu. au/dstern/EEP/eep9701, pdf.
  • 8Wetaman W. How much are nature's services worth? [J]. Science, 1977, 197: 960-964.
  • 9世界资源研究所 联合国环境规划署 联合国开发计划署.世界资源报告(1998-1999)[R].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.30.
  • 10BoonPJ CalowP PettsGE(宁远译).河流保护与管理[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1997.260-270.

共引文献48

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部