摘要
对刑事证据能力的审查判断不仅发生在庭审阶段,还发生在侦查阶段和审查起诉阶段。证据"三性"的不同质性和相对独立性为证据调查者遵循一定的思维路径以便审查判断证据能力提供了可能。侦查人员需要遵循的思维路径为:关联性——可印证性——合法性,且主要考虑关联性和可印证性。检察人员也需遵循该路径,但认定合法性时更为严格;而审判人员则需遵循"合法性——关联性——可印证性"的路径。
The examination and decision on competency of criminal evidence not only occurs on trial stage, but also occurs on investigation stage and review and prosecution stage. The traits of essentially difference and relatively independence of the ＂3-Elements＂ of evidence make it possible for evidence investigator to comply with a thinking pathway when examining and deciding the competency of evidence. The thinking pathway that the investigators shall comply with is relevancy- comfirmability- legality and they shall mainly consider relevancy and comfirmability. The porcuratorial personnel shall also comply with such pathway, however, they shall mainly consider legality. The judicial personnel shall comply with the pathway of legality- relevancy- comfirmability.
出处
《重庆电子工程职业学院学报》
2011年第4期57-59,共3页
Journal of Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering
关键词
不同质性
相互独立性
证据能力
思维路径
essentially difference
relatively independence
competency of evidence
thinking pathway
