期刊文献+

基于利益相关者的企业环境绩效驱动机制及实证 被引量:9

An empirical research on the driving mechanism of corporation environmental performance based on stakeholder theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于利益相关者和企业环境绩效可能存在的驱动响应关系,提出将企业主体、政府部门、投资者、消费者、社区公众作为5个典型的利益相关者,构建了企业环境绩效的驱动因子体系.选取2008年度国内300强企业作为初始样本,详细整理其公开的环境信息,筛选确定以环境信息公开相对完善的41家企业为案例进行实证分析.企业环境绩效与驱动因素的Spearman相关分析表明,企业主体是环境绩效的主导驱动因素,政府部门和投资者是环境绩效的重要推动因素,而消费者和社区公众对环境绩效未有显著影响;典范对应分析表明,企业环境绩效驱动因素可归为3类,对企业环境绩效的总解释能力达到80.7%;53.66%的案例企业分别受到企业环境管理能力、政府环境规制、企业环境风险等因素的独立作用,而其余企业则受多因素共同作用. Based on the theory of stakeholders, the driving mechanism of corporation environmental performance (CEP) was systemically established. The top 300 corporations in 2008 were selected as the initial samples, and all the open environmental information was collected and analyzed, finally 41 corporations were chosen for further research. The Spearman relationship analysis showed that corporation itself had the greatest impact on CEP, the government and investor's effect was slighter, while consumers and community public had no influence. The indicators affecting CEP could be summarized into three categories by using CCA analysis, which would interpret 80.7% variation of CEP; 53.66% corporations were affected by corporation environmental management ability, government environment regulation and corporation environmental risk, respectively, while others CEP would be interpreted by co-indicators.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期1931-1936,共6页 China Environmental Science
基金 上海市科委科技支撑计划项目(09dz1202704) 上海市科委科技攻关专项(10231202000) 教育部人文社科研究项目(09YJC840024) 上海大学创新基金项目(2009)
关键词 利益相关者 企业环境绩效:驱动机制 典范对应分析 stakeholder corporation environmental performance driving mechanism canonical correspondence analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1杨洁,毕军,张海燕,李凤英,周鲸波,刘蓓蓓.中国环境污染事故发生与经济发展的动态关系[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(4):571-576. 被引量:34
  • 2杨东宁,周长辉.企业环境绩效与经济绩效的动态关系模型[J].中国工业经济,2004(4):43-50. 被引量:134
  • 3Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005,76(2): 105-118.
  • 4Melnyk S A, Sroufe R E Calantone R. Assessing the impact of environmental management system on corporate and environmental performance [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003,21 (3): 329-351.
  • 5Montabon F, Sroufe R, Narasimhan R. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and fa-m performance [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(5):998-1014.
  • 6Clarkson P M, Li Y, Richardson G D, et al. Revisiting the relation between cnvirimmental performance and cnvironmental disciosure:an empirical analysis[J].Accounting,Organizations and Society,2008,33(4/5):303-327.
  • 7Hughes S B, Anderson A, Golden S. Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance7 [J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2001,20(3):217-240.
  • 8Jos6 F, Molina-Azorfn, Enrique Claver-Cort6s, et al. Environmental practices and fn'm performance: an empirical analysis in the Spanish hotel industry [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(5):516-524.
  • 9程华,廖中举.中国区域环境创新绩效评价与研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(3):522-528. 被引量:35
  • 10秦颖,武春友,徐光.企业行为与环境绩效之间关系的相关性分析与实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(2):129-132. 被引量:28

二级参考文献92

共引文献255

同被引文献132

引证文献9

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部