期刊文献+

两种通气法中听觉诱发电位的运用与比较 被引量:1

Comparison of AAI between Two Different Airway Devices for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:听觉诱发电位指数(AAI)是监测麻醉深度的一项新指标,ProSeal喉罩是一种新型通气喉罩。本实验探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的两种麻醉通气法中听觉诱发电位与传统监测指标的优异。方法:100名择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者随机分为ProSeat喉罩(PLMA)组与气管插管(ETT)组。在全麻诱导插管期比较两组中听觉诱发电位指数(AAJ),血糖(BG),平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR)的变化。结果:两组中AAI在麻醉诱导期无差异,但在插管期PLMA组AAI比ETT组更平稳。两组中BG,MAP,HR也有类似变化。结论:ProSeal喉罩能减轻全麻插管的应激反应,AAI比传统监测指标能更好地反应插管应激。 Objective: A-Line ARX IndexTM(AAI) is a new parameter to monitor the depth of anesthesia and FroSeal LMA (laryngeal mask airway)is a new laryngeal mask airway for ventilation. This study was designed to investigate the stress response with different parameters during anesthesia induction and intubation to compare the outcomes produced by ProSeal laryngeal mask airway(PLMA) and endotrocheal tube(ETT) respectively used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: One hundred selected patients for laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) were randomized into two groups (PLMA group and ETT group),an identical general anesthesia technique was used in all patients. The primary outcome measure was AA1. Secondary outcome measures included blood glucose(BG),mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR).Results: There was no statistical difference in AAI between the PLMA group and the ETT group during anesthesia induction, but AA1 maintained more stable in the PLMA group than the ETT group during airway insertion; there was a similarity among BG,MAP and HR between these two groups. Conclusions: These results suggest that the usage of PLMA can attenuate the stress response in general anesthesia and AAI is as good as txaditional parameters to reflect tile stress response.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2011年第9期1599-1601,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 听觉诱发电位指数 应激反应 腹腔镜胆囊摘除术 AA1 Stress Response Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Heleen J,Blusse van Oud-Alblas,Jeroen W,et al.Comparison of Bispectral Index and Composite Auditory Evoked Potential Index for Monitoring Depth of Hypnosis in Children[J].Anesthesiology 2008;108:851-857.
  • 2Elaheh Allahyary,Farid Zand,Hamid Reza Tabatabaee.Evaluation of the Adequacy of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Section by Auditory Evoked Potential Index:An Observational Study[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2008;46(1):16-24.
  • 3Heleen J,Blussevan Oud-Alblas,Jeroen W,et al.A Comparison in Adolescents of Composite Auditory Evoked Potential Index and Bispectral Index During Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia for Scoliosis Surgery with Intraoperative Wake-Up Test[J].Anesth Analg 2008;107:1683-1688.
  • 4Tomoki Nishiyama.Comparison of the two different auditory evoked potentials index monitors in propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia[J].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2009;21:551-554.
  • 5Jee-Ching Hsu,Ching-Yue Yang,Lai-Chu See,et al.Propofol ensures a more stable A-line ARX index than thiopental during intubation[J].Can J Anesth 2005;52(7):692-696.
  • 6P.Martorano,E.Facco,G.Falzetti,et al.Spectral entropy assessment with auditory evoked potential in neuroanesthesia[J].Clinical Neurophysiology 2007;118:505-512.
  • 7陈明,宫练,金立民,余凌.ProSeal喉罩(PLMA)与气管插管(TT)在妇科腹腔镜手术中的实验研究比较[J].中国实验诊断学,2010,14(7):1093-1094. 被引量:6
  • 8李云,胡宪文,翁立军,张野.在妇科腹腔镜手术中应用Proseal喉罩全麻的疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2010,8(22):12-14. 被引量:6
  • 9冯洁华,李朝阳,黄诗栋,敖杰,罗晓敏.双管喉罩与标准型喉罩用于妇科腹腔镜麻醉的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2009,25(7):600-602. 被引量:40
  • 10张双菊,肖维,江春秀.腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻期间双管喉罩与气管导管的应用比较[J].重庆医学,2010,39(20):2748-2750. 被引量:14

二级参考文献36

  • 1史东平,祝义军,封卫征,闻大翔,杭燕南.食管引流型喉罩在腹腔镜胆囊手术麻醉中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(7):511-513. 被引量:56
  • 2周仁龙,杭燕南.第三代喉罩的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(11):880-882. 被引量:162
  • 3Asai T, Editorial Ⅱ. Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br J Anaesth, 2004,93: 497-500.
  • 4Brimacombe J.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:506-520.
  • 5Brimaeombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, et al. Positive Pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway:a randomized crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg,2001,93:1351-1359.
  • 6Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, et al. The ProSeal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trail with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 88:534-539.
  • 7祝义军,刘晨霞,马丽敏.用引导管协助置入食管引流型喉罩的60例分析[J].重庆医学,2007,36(15):1521-1522. 被引量:7
  • 8Lim Y,Goel S,Brimacombe JB,The proseal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2007,35(1):52.
  • 9Roth H,Genzwuerker HV,Rothhaas A,et al,The proseal laryngeal mask airway and The laryngeal tube suction for Ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopyic surgery[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2005,22(2):117.
  • 10Maltby JR,Beriault MT, Watson NC,et al.Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classie vs. tracheal intubation[J].Can J Anaesth,2000,47(7):622-626.

共引文献54

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部