摘要
目的探讨急诊输液中潜在的护理风险因素，并对比经临床路径和常规路径对急诊输液患者护理方法的效果。方法随机抽取我院2010年2月至2011年2月收治的400例普通急诊输液患者，随机分为实验组和对照组各200例，实验组行临床路径护理，对照组行常规路径护理。术后随访1～2个月。采用抑郁自评量表（SDS）和焦虑自评量表（SAS）对2组患者治疗前后的心理状态进行评价，并对护理效果进行统计。结果治疗后实验组SDS和SAS评分均优于对照组。实验组干预后显效160例，有效30例，无效10例，总有效率（包括显效和有效）为95％，显著优于对照组。结论早期行临床路径护理可减少急诊输液中潜在的护理风险因素的发生，是避免急诊输液患者产生不稳定心理的重要方法。
Objective To explore the potential risk factors in nursing of emergency infusion, and compare the nursing effect of clinical path and conventional methods on emergency infusion patients. Methods 400 patients of our hospital who needed emergency infusion from February 2010 to February 2011 were admitted and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 200 patients in each group. The experimental group adopted clinical nursing pathway, the control group selected routine care pathway. All patients were followed up for two months. The psychological state of patients were assessed by using self-rating depression scale （ SDS ） and selfrating anxiety scale （ SAS ）, and the nursing effect was statistically evaluated. Results After treatment, the SDS and SAS scores of the experimental group were better than those of the control group. 160 cases were markedly effective after the intervention in the experimental group, 30 cases were effective, 10 patients showed no effect, the total efficiency rate was 95% in the experimental group, higher than that of the control group. Conclusions Early application of clinical nursing pathway can reduce the potential risk factors of emergency infusion, it is an important method to avoid unstable psychology of patients undergoing emergency infusion.
出处
《中国实用护理杂志》
北大核心
2011年第29期56-57,共2页
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词
临床路径
急诊
输液
Clinical pathway
Emergency
Infusion
