摘要
目的:在中国文化情境下探讨生命意义源的结构并编制测量工具。方法:在项目分析的基础上,对721名被试进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,并进行信度和效度指标的检验。结果:生命意义源包含5个维度:社会关注、自我成长、关系和谐、生活享受以及身心健康,共解释总变异的59.50%.;验证性因素分析结果表明,生命意义源量表1阶5因素模型拟合较好。总量表及各维度内部一致性系数在0.71-0.94之间。量表与自尊量表、关注生命意义指标以及生命意义源简述量表存在显著正相关,表明该量表具有较好的校标效度。结论:生命意义源量表具有良好的心理测量学指标,可用以进一步相关研究中。
Objective: To explore the theoretical structural model of the sources of meaning in the Chinese cultural situation, and based on this model to develop an instrument called the Sources of Meaning in Life-Chinese(SML-C). Methods: Based on item analysis, data were collected from 721 subjects. EFA and CFA were used to test their reliability and validity. Results: It was showed that the structure of sources of meaning in life included five components: Social Preoccu- pation, Self-Transcendence, Personal Relations, Life Enjoyment, Body and Mental Health, explaining 59.50% of the total variance; the result of CFA showed that the measurement model fit the data well. The Cronbach ct coefficients of the total and each subscale were between 0.71-0.94. The correlations between SML-C and RVS, LRI and SOMP-R were signifi- cantly positive, which showed that SML-C had good criterion validity. Conclusion: The Sources of Meaning in Life-Chinese is a reliable and valid measure in Chinese culture, which can be used in future researches.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2011年第5期591-594,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC880013)
关键词
生命意义源
信度
效度
Source of meaning in life
Reliability
Validity