摘要
Levinson认为Grice的会话准则与Bourdieu的惯习概念是同一路的。研究对此进行批评性反思,指出二者有本质的不同,在深层假设、性质和约束力各方面都有不同表现,差异大于共性,而不像kvinson所说的二者性质相同,前者比后者明晰。惯习反倒是与Grice的禀性概念接近。
A critical analysis is conducted to delineate the similarities and differences between Griee's notion of conversational maxims and Bourdieu's habitus. It shows, unlike Levinson' s claim that the two are of a similar kind of beast with the former more distinct than the latter, the two differ in essential ways: the basic hypothesis, features and restrictive powers. Habitus is, comparatively, closer to Grice' s notion of propension.
出处
《山东外语教学》
北大核心
2011年第4期9-14,共6页
Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金
北京林业大学青年科技启动基金资助(项目编号:2010BLX21)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:RW2011-25)
关键词
惯习
会话准则
禀性
habitus
conversational maxims
propension