期刊文献+

不同股权结构的国有企业治理效率比较研究——以山东省为例 被引量:19

A Comparative Research on Governance Efficiency of State-owned Enterprises under Different Ownership Structure——A Case Study of Shandong Province
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文首先提出了国有企业治理效率假说,在利用试验性因子模型检验假说合理性的基础上,构建了国有企业治理效率评价指标体系;进而通过因子综合评价模型,根据山东省企业实际数据全面分析了具有不同股权结构特征的国有独资企业、国有独资公司、国有控股企业的治理效率,并与集体企业、私营企业和港澳台企业进行了比较,从实证的角度再次验证了治理效率假说的合理性,从而客观地评价了"新国企"的效率。 This paper proposes governance efficiency of state-owned enterprises hypothesis, and uses exploratory factor analysis to test the rationality of the hypothesis. At the same time, the author develops an index system for assessing governance efficiency of state-owned enterprises. With comprehensive evaluation model of factor analysis and enterprise data of Shandong Province, the author analyses governance efficiency of State-owned enterprises, state-owned companies and state-controlled enterprises of different ownership structure, and makes an comparative research with collective enterprises, private enterprises and Hong Kong-Macao-Taiwan enterprises. Empirical analysis also verifies the hypothesis. Thus, the paper objectively evaluates efficiency of "new" state-owned enterprises.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第9期130-139,共10页 China Industrial Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目"监管机制对国有企业自主创新能力的影响研究"(批准号09YJA790124) 山东省自然科学基金项目"模块营销提升山东省国有企业自主创新能力的机理与实证研究"(批准号Y2008A26) 国家自然科学基金项目"市场经济条件下国有资本产业分布与演变方式实证研究"(批准号70973070)
关键词 国有企业 治理效率 股权结构 state-owned enterprises governance efficiency ownership structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Costello A. B., Osborne J. W. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations tor Getting the Most out of Your Data[J]. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2005,10(7).
  • 2Hayton J. C., Allen D. G., Scarpello V. Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Tutorial on Parallel Analysis[J]. Organizational Research Methods,2004,7(2).
  • 3Ledesma R. D., Valero-Mora P. Determining the Number of Factors to Retain in EFA: An Easy-to-Use Computer Program for Carrying out Parallel Analysis [J]. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,2007,12 (2).
  • 4Horn. A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis[J]. Psychometrika,1965,30(2).
  • 5Cota A. A., Longman R. S., Holden R. R., et al. Interpolating 95th Percentile Eigenvalues from Random Data: An Empirical Example[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement,1993,53(3).
  • 6DeVellis R F. Scale Development[M]. Sage Publisher,1991.
  • 7张维迎,马捷.恶性竞争的产权基础[J].经济研究,1999,34(6):11-20. 被引量:279
  • 8林毅夫,李周.现代企业制度的内涵与国有企业改革方向[J].经济研究,1997,32(3):3-10. 被引量:360
  • 9张夏准.富国的伪善[M].严荣译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
  • 10[澳]史卓顿,公共物品、公共企业和公共选择[M].费朝辉等译.北京:经济科学出版社,2000.

二级参考文献110

共引文献1979

同被引文献380

引证文献19

二级引证文献278

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部