摘要
学术不端行为通常被看作是道德建设问题,这种看法意味着学术不端行为的产生取决于道德意识,是一种自主的道德行为;但是根据社会建构论的观点,学术不端行为是社会建构的产物。在整个建构因素中,主要涉及到制度制定者、科学社团、学校、研究者、媒体等6个因素。它们都可能成为学术不端行为的触发因素,但是不同因素在其中的主导作用并不相同。所以面对具体的学术不端行为首先要抓住主导触发因素。
Academic misconduct is usually regarded as a moral construction p one of the products of moral consciousness. It is a kind of independent moral ism, the view of academic misconduct is the product of social constructivism. volves system makers, scientific community, school, researchers, media and In the whole construction factors, it mainly in other six factors. They may be the trigger factor of academic misconduct, hut different factors play different roles in it. Therefore, facing the specific academic misconduct should analyze the leading factor firstly.
出处
《衡阳师范学院学报》
2011年第4期79-82,共4页
Journal of Hengyang Normal University
基金
上海市教育委员会2010度科研创新项目(10YZ25)
关键词
社会建构论
学术不端行为
网络分析
Social Constructivism
Academic Misconduct
Network Analysis
