论比较教育研究的跨学科性--比较教育亚学科群建构被引量：10

Cross-disciplinarity of Comparative Education Research:The Construction of Sub-discipline Branches of Comparative Education

下载PDF

导出

摘要跨学科性是比较教育学的基本属性,在比较教育研究中存在着学科性质的争论,并出现了领域论、学科论、领域和学科双重论、跨学科论等观点。跨学科性是科学研究所具有的一种普适性,比较教育研究跨学科研究是由教育的复杂性因素决定的,体现出方法多元性、全面性、区域差异性等特征。比较教育研究的跨学科性的具体表现应该是比较教育亚学科群的建构,如比较教育社会学、比较教育政治学、比较教育经济学、比较教育政治经济学、比较教育文化人类学等。 Cross-disciplinarity is the basic attribute of comparative education. Debates on the nature of discipline in comparative education research have brought about views with different focus, such as that on domain, discipline, both domain and discipline, or cross discipline. Cross-disciplinarity is the general nature of scientific research. The cross-disciplinary research in comparative education studies is determined by the education complexity and is characterized by multi-methods, comprehensiveness and regional difference. The cross-clisciplinarity of comparative education study should be reflected in the construction of subdiscipline branches of comparative education such as comparative education in sociology, politics, economics, political economics and anthropology etc.

作者朱旭东

机构地区教育部普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学教师教育研究中心

出处《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期46-53,共8页 Journal of Educational Studies

关键词比较教育研究跨学科性亚学科群 comparative education research cross-disciplinarity sub-discipline branches

分类号 G40-059.3 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1朱丽·汤普森·克莱恩.跨越边界-知识学科学科互涉[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2005:284.
2Altbach, P.G. Trends in comparative education[J]. Comparative Education Review,1991 ,35(3) :491-507.
3Alexander, R. Culture and Pedagogy: international comparisons in primary edocation[M]. Oxford and Boston: Blackwell. 2001 :1.
4Wendy Bignold and Liz Gayton. Global Issues and Comparative Edueation[M]. Learning Matters. 2009:7.
5Kazamias, Andreas M. Re-inventing the Historical in Comparative Education: reflections on a protean episteme by a contemporary player [J]. Comparative Education, 2001,37(4): 440-441.
6Trethewey, A. R. Introducing Comparative Education [M]. Oxford: Pergamon,1976.
7Edmund J. King. The Purpose of Comparative Education [J]. Comparative Education, 1965,1(3) :147-159.
8Phillips, David and Schweisfurth, Michele. Comparative and International Education: an introduction to theory, method, and practice[M]. Bristol: Continuum, 2006.
9Kazamias, Andreas M. Comparative education., historical reflections [M]// R. Cowen and A. M. Kazamias (eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education. Springer Science Business MediaB. V. 2009 : 139- 157.
10教育部社会科学委员会学风建设委员会.高校人文社会科学学术规范指南[Z].北京:高等教育出版社,2009:2.