期刊文献+

Quadrant通道下微创治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的近期疗效观察 被引量:17

SHORT-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF Quadrant RETRACTOR IN TREATMENT OF RECURRENT LUMBAR DISC PROTRUSION
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价Quadrant通道下微创治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法 2008年7月-2010年3月,对18例复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者采用Quadrant通道下椎间盘突出髓核摘除术治疗。其中男13例,女5例;年龄35~67岁,平均43岁。手术节段:L4、5 6例,L5、S1 12例。首次手术至复发时间为12~120个月,平均42.8个月。患者均行X线片、CT及MRI检查确诊原椎间盘再次突出。末次随访时采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和改良MacNab标准评定患者症状改善情况。结果手术时间40~80 min,平均60 min;术中出血量80~120 mL,平均100 mL。手术切口均Ⅰ期愈合;术中2例发生脑脊液漏,未行修补,术后3 d拔除引流片后切口愈合。术后无椎间隙感染、神经损伤、定位错误等并发症发生。18例均获随访,随访时间12~30个月,平均22个月。末次随访时按改良MacNab标准评价疗效,获优12例,良6例。末次随访时,腿痛VAS评分由术前的(7.3±2.2)分降至(2.0±1.3)分,差异有统计学意义(t=11.08,P=0.00)。随访期间无复发。结论 Quadrant通道下椎间盘突出髓核摘除术具有创伤小、并发症少等优点,是治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的一种安全有效的微创手术方法。 Objective To investigate the effectiveness of Quadrant retractor for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc protrusion. Methods Between July 2008 and March 2010, 18 cases of recurrent lumbar disc protrusion were treated with Quadrant. There were 13 males and 5 females with an average age of 43 years (range, 35-67 years). Involved segments included L4, 5 in 6 cases and L5, S1 in 12 cases. The time between first operation and recurrence was 12-120 months (mean, 42.8 months). Before operation, radiological evaluation including X-ray, CT, and MRI were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time was 40-80 minutes (mean, 60 minutes), and the amount of blood loss was 80-120 mL (mean, 100 mL). All operations were performed successfully, and no complication of infection and nerve injury occurred. Incisions healed by first intention. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 2 cases and was cured at 3 days after operation by removal of drainage. Eighteen patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 22 months). The VAS score of leg pain was decreased from 7.3±2.2 preoperatively to 2.0±1.3 at the final follow-up, showing significant difference (t=-11.08, P=0.00). According to modified MacNab criteria, the results were excellent in 12 patients and good in 6 patients. No recurrence was found during follow-up. Conclusion Discectomy via Quadrant retractor is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical technique in treating recurrent lumbar disc protrusion.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期960-963,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 QUADRANT通道 髓核摘除术 微创技术 复发性腰椎间盘突出症 Quadrant retractor Discectomy Minimally invasive surgery Recurrent lumbar disc protrusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Smith M, Foley K. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg, 1997, 121(3): 301-307.
  • 2徐少克.经皮内窥镜下手术治疗复发性腰椎盘突出症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20(7):541-543. 被引量:23
  • 3Smith JS, Ogden AT, Shafizadeh S, et al. Clinical outcomes after mi- croendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. J Spi- nal Disord Tech, 2010, 23(1): 30-34.
  • 4Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, et al. Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(3): 443-450.
  • 5Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomized study com- paring full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus micro- surgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22(2): 122-129.
  • 6Shin KH, Chang HG, Rhee NK, et al. Revisional percutaneous full en- doscopic disc surgery for recurrent herniation of previous open lumbar discectomy. Asian Spine J, 2011, 5( 1): 1-9.
  • 7Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, et al. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a pro- spective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(9): 973-978.
  • 8Lee DY, Shim CS, Ahn Y, et al. Comparison of percutaneous endo- scopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for re- current disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009, 46(6): 515-521.
  • 9Chen Z, Zhao J, Liu A, et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Or- thop, 2009, 33(1): 197-201.
  • 10卓祥龙,胡建中,李兵,孙宏志,陈耀辉,胡朝辉.三种术式治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症比较研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2009,23(12):1422-1426. 被引量:12

二级参考文献51

  • 1邓树才,董荣华,赵合元,周静.腰椎间盘突出症手术失败原因和再手术方法的探讨[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):90-95. 被引量:32
  • 2周跃,王健,初同伟,李长青,王卫东,郑文杰,张正丰,郝勇,潘勇.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定、内窥镜下腰椎管减压、椎间融合的临床应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(5):333-336. 被引量:55
  • 3王冰,吕国华,马泽民,李晶.腹腔镜辅助与小切口技术行前路L4/5椎间融合术的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(5):341-345. 被引量:13
  • 4Carragee EJ, Spinnikie AO, Alamin TF, et al. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy" short-term out-comes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(6): 653-657.
  • 5Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, et al. Clinical outcomes after discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anttlar competence. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85(1): 102-108.
  • 6Kim MS, Park KW, Hwang C, et al. Recurrence rate of lumbar disc herniation after open discectomy in active young men. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34(1): 24-29.
  • 7Johnsson R. Surgical treatment of symptomatic recurrent disc herniation// Herkowitz HN, Dvorak J, Bell G, et al. The Lumbar Spine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005: 867.
  • 8Osterman H, Sund R, Seitsalo S, et al. Risk of multiple reoperations after lumbar discectomy: a population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28(6): 621-627.
  • 9Connolly ES. Surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Clin Neurosurg, 1992, 39: 211-216.
  • 10Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Repeat decompression of lumbar nerve roots. A prospective two-year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1993, 75(6): 894-897.

共引文献50

同被引文献158

引证文献17

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部