摘要
目的比较传统疝修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中临床疗效。方法选取2006年2月至2010年12月期间住院的120例腹股沟疝患者,随机分为两组,对照组40例:采用传统修补术,治疗组80例:使用疝环充填式无张力修补术。对比分析两组手术时间、下床时间、住院时间、术后并发症和复发等情况。结果治疗组在下床活动时间、住院时间、术后并发症和复发率方面均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),在手术时间上无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论疝环充填式无张力疝修补术具有住院时间短、创伤小、痛苦小、术后恢复快、伤口无感染、成功率较高、复发率低等优点,符合腹股沟解剖和生理结构,为目前腹股沟疝手术治疗的首选术式。
Objective To compare the traditional hernioplasty and plug mesh hernia repair in the clinical treatment of inguinal hernia.Methods One hundred twenty cases of inguinal hernia hospitalized from February 2006 to December 2010 were randomly selected and divided into two groups.The control group（40 cases） underwent traditional hernioplasty,the treatment group（80 cases） treated by plug mesh hernia repair.The operative time,hospitalization time,postoperative complications and recurrence were compared between two groups.Results There were significant differences（P0.05） in reambulation,hospitalization time,postoperative complications and recurrence rate between two groups,however no difference was found in operative time between two groups（P 0.05）.Conclusion The plug mesh hernia repair is a good choice for inguinal hernia surgery at present because of the short hospital stay,rapid recovery,no wound infection,and low recurrence rate.
出处
《临床和实验医学杂志》
2011年第16期1254-1255,1257,共3页
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
