摘要
程序分化涉及民事诉讼法修改中应该规定哪些种类的第一审诉讼程序这一重要问题。程序分化方案应当包括以下基本内容:保留"简易-普通"的基本分类;现有的简易程序进一步分化为"小额"、"速裁"和"简易"三种程序;对普通程序在缩小合议制适用范围的同时以"规则形成"为指向加以规范;程序设计整体上注重与司法ADR的衔接及相互之间的关系整合。本文对小额程序的设置必要性和具体程序设计做了论证,并以司法实践中的案件类型划分为依据,考察简易程序的适用范围、普通程序与适当延长审限及合议制的关系,还提出引入"特别上告"制度以促进高层级法院通过直接审判案件发展指导性案例的建议。
Procedure division is concerned with a critical issue that which types of the first instance should be stipulated in the current amendments to the Civil Procedure Law. The procedure division scheme should include the following contents： retain the basic category of ＂summary - normal＂ ; further divide the existing summary procedure into three types of procedure of ＂small amount＂, ＂speedy decision＂ and ＂summary＂ ; guided by the ＂formation of rules＂, regulate the normal procedure when reducing the scope of application of the colle- gial system; with regard to the procedure design, on the whole, attention paid to the connection and the integration of mutual relationship between justice and the ADR. The necessity of setting up the small amount procedure and detailed procedure design are discussed. In addition, this article explores the application scope of summary procedure and the connection between normal procedure and appropriately prolonging the time limit for concluding a trial and collegial system based on the category of case types in judicial practice. Furthermore, suggestion of introducing ＂special appeal＂ system to promote the superior courts to develop guided cases through direct judgment is put forward.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期181-190,共10页
China Legal Science
基金
北京市支持中央在京高校共建研究项目"民事诉讼法修改与多元化争议解决机制的完善"课题成果之一
