期刊文献+

基于GONE理论视角的上市公司财务报告舞弊研究 被引量:21

A Study of Fraudulent Financial Reporting of Listed Companies: A Perspective Based on GONE Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对2007年因披露虚假会计信息被证监会或财政部处罚过的37家上市公司,及其与之资产规模相同或相近的40家良好的公司为对照组实证研究,从GONE理论全面考察影响财务报告舞弊的需要、机会、暴露、贪婪因素。研究发现,财务危机、避免T处理或退市是其主要压力,股权集中度较高、内部控制失效、会计师事务所规模小、惩罚的性质不严厉等因素为财务报告舞弊提供了机会。对此,必须从GONE理论的四个因素角度完善治理我国会计舞弊的措施。 This article conducts an empirical study of the 37 listed companies that were punished in 2007 by China Securities Regulatory Commission or the Ministry of Finance for disclosure of fraud accounting information with 40 good-credit companies of the same or roughly the same asset size selected as the control group.It comprehensively examines such factors affecting the fraud financial reporting as the need,opportunity,exposure,greed,etc.from the perspective of the GONE theory.The study finds that the main pressure comes from financial crisis,avoidance of T treatment or delisting;and such factors as higher share concentration ratio,failure of internal control,small scale of accounting firms,un-severe punishment,etc.can offer opportunities for fraud financial reporting.Against this,the measures to govern the accounting fraud in China should be improved from the four factors of the GONE theory.
作者 饶斌
出处 《江西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期34-40,共7页 Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 2009年江西财经大学校级青年课题"信息含量导向的资本市场审计契约研究--基于核心知识视角"
关键词 财务报告舞弊 GONE理论 需要 fraudulent financial reporting GONE theory demand
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献61

  • 1薛祖云,黄彤.董事会、监事会制度特征与会计信息质量——来自中国资本市场的经验分析[J].财经理论与实践,2004,25(4):84-89. 被引量:113
  • 2秦江萍.上市公司会计舞弊:国外相关研究综述与启示[J].会计研究,2005(6):69-74. 被引量:96
  • 3康芒斯 于树生译.制度经济学[M].商务印书馆,1962..
  • 4李志文.盈余管理前沿[R].厦门:厦门大学会计系学术报告,2002..
  • 5何红.[D].上海:复旦大学,2002.
  • 6王立彦,刘军霞.A-H股公司财务信息差异与治理特征[J].中国证券业研究,2003,(1).
  • 7Dunn, P. 2004. The impact of insider power on fraudulent financial reporting[J]. Journal of Management. 30 (3): 397-412.
  • 8Summers, S. and J. Sweeney. 1998. Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis[J]. The Accounting Review. 73 ( 1 ): 131-146.
  • 9American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (A1CPA) . 2002. Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement onAuditing Standards No. 99[M]. New York, NY: AICPA.
  • 10Beasley, M. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud[J]. The Accounting Review. 71 (4): 443-465.

共引文献233

同被引文献96

引证文献21

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部