期刊文献+

荷包包埋法在胃癌根治术十二指肠残端处理中的临床意义 被引量:12

Clinical application of pocks embedding in duodenal stump closure after radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价荷包包埋法在胃癌根治术十二指肠残端处理中的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析1995年1月至2009年12月浙江省人民医院2034例因胃癌行全胃切除或胃次全切除术患者的临床资料,十二指肠残端行荷包包埋(A组)465例,十二指肠残端行直线切割闭合器关闭+浆肌层包埋(B组)835例,十二指肠残端行全层+浆肌层包埋(C组)734例。对比分析各组手术费用、十二指肠残端处理时间、术后近期并发症、术中出血量、术后恢复情况。结果2034例患者术中无死亡,术后近期(1个月内)95例(4.7%)发生并发症,其中切口感染36例(37.9%),腹腔内出血18例(18.9%),吻合口漏14例(14.7%),3组之间差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。A组患者术后未发生十二指肠残端漏,与B组(6例,0.72%)和C组(5例,0.68%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.048)。A组和C组的手术费用均显著低于B组[(9902±312)元和(9896±281)元比(13129±237)元,均P=0.0001],A、c两组之间差异无统计学意义。A组和B组十二指肠残端处理时间均明显短于C组[(7.1±0.9)min和(7.6±0.8)min比(11.5±1.4)min,均P=0.0001],A、B两组之间差异无统计学意义。3组术中出血量、术后恢复情况差异均无统计学意义(均/9〉0.05)。结论荷包包埋法处理十二指肠残端手术时间短,费用低廉,十二指肠残端漏发生率低,是胃癌手术十二指肠残端关闭的一种安全可靠、简单快捷的理想术式。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of pockets embedding in duodenal stump closure after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods A total of 2034 patients undergoing gastrectomy from January 1995 to December 2009 at our hospital were reviewed. Among them, Group A ( n = 465 ) underwent pockets embedding for duodenal stump, Group B ( n = 835 ) line-cutting stapler and hand-sewing while Group C ( n = 734 ) double layer hand-sewing. The operation cost, processing time of duodenal stump, recent post-operative complications (within 1 month), blood loss volume and post-operative recovery status were compared between 3 groups. Results No patient died of operation. Ninety-five cases (4. 7% ) suffered recent post-operative complications. The most frequent complications included wound infection (36 cases, 37.9% ), intra-abdominal hemorrhage ( 18 cases, 18.9% ) and anastomotic leakage ( 14 cases, 14. 7% ). There was no significant difference in intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leakage, abdominal infection, wound infection or duodenal stump leakage among 3 groups. There was no duodenal stump leakage in Group A. The difference was apparent in comparisons with Groups B (6 cases, 0. 72% ) and C (5 cases, 0. 68% ). The operation costs of Groups A [ (9902±312) RMB] and C [ (9896±281 ) RMB] were significantly lower than that of Group B [ ( 13 129±237 ) RMB, P = 0. 0001 ]. And there was no difference between Groups A and C. The processing time of duodenal stump in Groups A [ (7. 1±0. 9) min] and B [ (7.6±0. 8) min ] were lower than that of Group C [ ( 11.5±1.4) min, P = 0. 0001 ]. And there was no difference between Groups A and B. There was no significant difference in blood loss volume or post- operative recovery status among 3 groups. Conclusion The post-gastrotomic closure of duodenal stump with pockets embedding for gastric cancer has a short operation time, a low operation cost and a low rate of duodenal stump leakage. It is a simple, prompt, promising and safe surgical procedure for gastric neoplasms.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第21期1475-1478,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 胃肿瘤 消化系统外科手术 手术后并发症 荷包包埋 Gastric neoplasms Digestive system surgical procedures Postoperative complications Pocks embedding
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1徐建军,黎介寿,荀宁军.外伤性十二指肠瘘的治疗[J].东南国防医药,2003,5(4):241-243. 被引量:6
  • 2张东生.胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔手术治疗96例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2005,5(2):335-336. 被引量:3
  • 3张超,余佩武,刘伟,吕伟.十二指肠残端瘘的诊断与治疗[J].重庆医学,2006,35(12):1097-1098. 被引量:18
  • 4蒋朱明,江华.谷氨酰胺双肽对手术后患者结局影响的临床随机对照研究荟萃分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(23):1610-1614. 被引量:36
  • 5Gouillat C, Chipponi J, Baulieux J, et al. Randomized controlled muhicentre trial of somatostatin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg, 2001,88 : 1456-1462.
  • 6Bodoky G, Harsanyi L, Pap A. Effect of enteral nutrition on exocrine pancreatic function. Am J Surg, 1991,161 : 144-148.
  • 7Han YM, Kim CY, Yang DH, et al. Fluorescopically guided feeding tube insertion for relief of postoperative gastrointestinal anastomotic obstruction and leakage. Cardiovasc lntervent Radiol, 2006,29 : 395-400.
  • 8Kim KW,Choi BI,Han JK,et al.Postoperative anatomic and pathologic findings at CT following gastrectomy[J].Radiographics,2002,22(2):323.
  • 9Dorta G.Role of octreotide and somatostatin in the treatment of intestinal fistulae[J].Digestion,1999,60(Suppl 2):53.
  • 10Farthmann EH, Schoffel U. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of intraabdominal infection. Infecton,1998,26(5)∶329

共引文献55

同被引文献94

  • 1徐建军,黎介寿,荀宁军.外伤性十二指肠瘘的治疗[J].东南国防医药,2003,5(4):241-243. 被引量:6
  • 2辜天慧,于泽洪,张骥.胃大部切除术617例的体会[J].重庆医学,2005,34(11):1686-1688. 被引量:2
  • 3徐俊,王磊,胡志鹏.十二指肠瘘的外科治疗(附12例报告)[J].宁夏医学院学报,2006,28(1):58-59. 被引量:3
  • 4张超,余佩武,刘伟,吕伟.十二指肠残端瘘的诊断与治疗[J].重庆医学,2006,35(12):1097-1098. 被引量:18
  • 5史俊涛,吴剑宏,童宜欣,高纯,胡俊波,龚建平.0.45%乳酸钠溶液在十二指肠残端瘘中的应用分析[J].临床外科杂志,2007,15(5):356-357. 被引量:2
  • 6Lee J Y, Ryu K W, Cho S J, et al. Endoscopic clipping of duodenal stump leakage after Bilroth gastrectomy in gastric cancer patient [J]. J Surg Oncol, 2009,100: 80-81.
  • 7李强,卞守华,章德昆.十二指肠残端瘘的诊治体会[J].中国肿瘤临床,1999,26:717.
  • 8Hsu JT, Liu MS, Wang F, et al. Standard radical gastrectomy in oc- togenarians and nonagenarians with gastric cancer: are short - term surgical results and long- term survival substantial? [ J]. J Gas- trointest Surg,2012,16(4) :728 -737.
  • 9Li H, Hall X, Su L, et al. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy versus traditional open surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer: Benefits and complications[ J ]. Mol Clin Oncol,2014,2 ( 4 ) : 530 - 534.
  • 10Han JH ,Jeong O, Ryu SY, et al. Efficacy of single - dose antimi- crobial prophylaxis for preventing surgical site infection in radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma [ J ]. J Gastric Cancer, 2014,14 (3) :156 -163.

引证文献12

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部