期刊文献+

胃旁路术对非肥胖型2型糖尿病疗效的前瞻性对照研究 被引量:15

Prospective controlled clinical study on gastric bypass surgery for nonobese type 2 diabetes mellitus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胃旁路术对非肥胖型2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效。方法前瞻性研究2008年11月至2009年8月第二军医大学附属长海医院收治的40例胃部疾病合并非肥胖型T2DM患者的临床资料,按实用性随机对照原则将患者分为4组,每组10例,分别接受毕Ⅰ式远端胃切除+胃十二指肠吻合术(BI组)、近端胃大部切除+食管残胃吻合术(PG组)、全胃切除+Y型吻合术(RY组)、毕Ⅱ式胃空肠吻合术(BⅡ组),后2种术式为胃旁路术。比较4组患者住院时间、胃部疾病治疗情况、手术前后体质指数、腰围、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血清胰岛素和空腹c肽水平等指标。数据采用方差分析、LSD—t检验、配对t检验、X2检验进行分析。结果4种术式对胃部疾病的疗效基本相同。RY组患者术前、术后6个月空腹血糖分别为(8.0±2.9)、(5.9±0.7)mmol/L,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(t=2.342,P〈0.05)。RY组患者术前糖化血红蛋白、空腹C肽分别为7.7%±1.1%、(1.30±0.54)μg/L,术后2、6个月分别为6.9%±0.6%、(1.95±0.86)μg/L和6.1%±0.4%、(2.18±0.63)μg/L,与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(t=4.920、6.063,3.012、4.651,P〈0.05)。RY组患者术前空腹血清胰岛素为(11±4)mU/L,术后1、2、6个月分别为(18±5)、(19±3)、(21±3)mU/L,与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(t=3.158,4.502,7.517,P〈0.05)。BⅡ组患者术前空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血清胰岛素和空腹血清c肽分别为(8.3±1.3)mmol/L、7.7%±0.9%、(13±4)mU/L、(1.34±0.48)μg/L,术后1、2、6个月分别为(6.7±1.2)mmol/L、6.8%±0.8%、(18±4)mU/L、(1.68±0.46)μg/L和(6.4±1.3)mmol/L、6.3%±0.6%、(18±4)mU/L、(1.96±0.67)μg/L及(5.6±0.7)mmol/L、6.0%±0.3%、(19±4)mU/L、(2.27±0.59)μg/L,与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(t=2.468、2.598、6.028,3.055、4.586、4.572,3.618、5.860、8.577,2.300、3.511、3.943,P〈0.05)。术后2、6个月4组患者空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、空腹C肽比较,差异有统计学意义(F=4.699、14.378,7.411、29.192,3.335、9.334,P〈0.05)。术后各时相点4组患者空腹血清胰岛素比较,差异有统计学意义(F=2.896,7.012,11.998,P〈0.05)。结论胃旁路术对非肥胖型T2DM具有较好疗效。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of nonobese type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods From November 2008 to August 2009, 40 patients with gastric diseases and nonobese type 2 diabetes mellitus were admitted to the Changhai Hospital, and their clinical data were prospectively studied. All patients were randomly divided into 4 groups: 10 patients received Billroth I distal gastrectomy + gastroduodenal anastomosis (B I group), 10 received proximal gastrectomy + remanant gastric esophageal anas- tomosis (PG group ), 10 received total gastrectomy + esophagoduodenal Y-anastomosis (RY group ) and 10 received subtotal gastrectomy Billroth Ⅱ gastro-jejunostomy ( B Ⅱ group). The length of hospital stay, pre- and postoperative body mass indexes (BMIs), waist circumferences, levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin ( GHbA1 ), fasting serum insulin (FSI) and fasting C-peptide (FCP) of patients in the 4 groups were compared. All data were analyzed using analysis of variance, LSD-t test, paired t test or chi-square test. Results The clinical effects of the 4 different operative procedures on the gastric diseases were similar. The levels of FBG were ( 8.0 ±2.9 ) mmol/L before operation and (5.9±0.7 ) mmol/L after operation in the RY group, with a significant difference (t = 2. 342, P 〈 0. 05 ). The preoperative level of GHbAI in the RY group was 7.7% ±1.1% , which was significantly higher than 6.9%±0.6% at 2 months after the operation and 6.1%±0.4% at 6 months after the operation (t =4. 920, 3. 012, P 〈0.05). The preoperative level of FCP in the RY group was ( 1.30± 0.54)μg/L, which was significantly lower than ( 1.95± 0.86)μg/L at 2 months after the operation and (2.18 ± 0.63 )μg/L at 6 months after the operation ( t = 6. 063, 4. 651, P 〈 0.05). The levels of FSI in the RY group at postoperative month 1, 2 and 6 were ( 18 ± 5 ), ( 19± 3 ), ( 21 ± 3 ) mU/L, which were significantly higher than the level of FSI [ (11±4) mU/L] before operation (t =3. 158, 4. 502, 7. 517, P 〈0.05). Pre-operative levels of FBG, GHbA1, FSI and FCP in the B Ⅱgroup were (8.3 - 1.3 )mmol/L, 7.7%± 0.9%, ( 13 - 4) mU/L and ( 1.34 ± 0.48 ) μg/L, which were significantly different from ( 6.7 ±1.2 ) mmol/L, 6.8%±0.8% , ( 18± 4) mU/L and ( 1.68± 0.46)μg/L at postoperative month 1, ( 6.4± 1.3 ) mmol/L, 6.3% + 0.6%, ( 18±4) mU/L and ( 1.96±0.67 ) μg/L at postoperative month 2, and (5.6 ± 0.7 ) mmol/L, 6.0%±0.3%, ( 19 ±4) mU/L and (2.27±0.59) μg/L at postoperative month 6 ( t = 2. 468, 2. 598, 6. 028 ; 3. 055, 4. 586, 4.572; 3.618, 5.860, 8.577; 2.300, 3.511, 3.943, P〈0.05). The levelsofFBG,GHbA1 and FCPinthe 4 groups at 2 months after surgery were significantly different from those at 6 months after surgery ( F = 4. 699, 14. 378 ; 7.411, 29. 192; 3. 335, 9. 334, P 〈 0.05). The levels of FSI in the 4 groups at different time points were significantly different ( F = 2. 896, 7. 012, 11. 998, P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The efficacy of gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of nonobese type 2 diabetes mellitus is satisfactory.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第3期206-209,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
关键词 糖尿病 2型 胃旁路术 临床对照研究 非肥胖型 Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Gastric bypass surgery Clinical controlled trials . Nonobese type
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Effect of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes mellitus : comparison of BMI > 35 and < 35 kg/m2. J Gastrointest Surg,2008,12 ( 5 ) :945-952.
  • 2青雪梅,房繄恭,刘保延,王永炎.实用性随机对照试验及其方法学特征思考[J].北京中医药大学学报,2008,31(1):14-18. 被引量:45
  • 3Ramos AC, Galvao Neto MP, de Souza YM, et al. Laparoscopic duodenal-jejunal exclusion in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mel- litus in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m^2 (LBMI). Obes Surg,2009, 19(3) :307-312.
  • 4Rodriguez-Grunert L, Galvao Neto MP. First human experience with endoscopieally delivered and retrieved duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve. Surg Obes Relat Dis,2008,4( 1 ) :55-59.
  • 5Lamounier RN, Pareja JC, Tambascia MA, et al. Incretins: clinical physiology and bariatric surgery--correlating the entero-endo- crine system and a potentially anti-dysmetabolic procedure. Obes Surg, 2007,17 ( 5 ) : 569 - 576.
  • 6Alexandrides TK, Skroubis G, Kalfarentzos F. Resolution of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and a variant of biliopanereatic diversion in patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg, 2007,17 ( 2 ) : 176-184.
  • 7李心翔,郑成竹,Raul J.Rosental.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃分流术治疗病态性肥胖合并2型糖尿病[J].中华消化外科杂志,2009,8(1):24-26. 被引量:17

二级参考文献15

  • 1SCHWARTX, LELLOUCH. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutic trials [ J ]. J Chron Dis, 1967, 20:637 - 648.
  • 2MACRAE KD. Pragmatic versus explanatory trials [ J ]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 1989, 5 (3) :333 - 339.
  • 3ALEX D. Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials[J]. Statist. Med, 2002,21 : 1365 - 1376.
  • 4GODWIN M, RUHLAND L, CASSON L, et al. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity[ J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology,2003, 3:28.
  • 5ROBERTS, TORGERSON. Understanding controlled trials Pragmatic versus Explanatory Trials [ J ]. BMJ, 1998,317 : 1301 - 1310.
  • 6MACPHERSON H. Pragmatic clinical trials [ J]. Complementary Therapies in Medicine ,2004,12 : 136 - 140.
  • 7ROLAND M, TORGERSON DJ. Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials? [J] BMJ, 1998, 316 (7127) :285.
  • 8HOTOPF M. The pragmatic r, mdomised controlled trial[ J]. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,2002,8:326- 333.
  • 9LES ALFOR, MSC,BAPPSC,et al. On differences between explanatory and pragmatic clinical trials[ J]. NZ Journal of Physiotherapy,2007,35 ( 1 ) : 12 - 16.
  • 10ROLAND M, TORGERSON D. What outcomes should be measured? [J]. BMJ,1998,317(17) :1075.

共引文献60

同被引文献176

引证文献15

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部