期刊文献+

不同延迟修复时间对神经端-侧缝合效果影响的实验研究 被引量:2

Experimental study of end-to-side neurorraphy after different intervals of delayed repair
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较不同时间延迟修复对神经端一侧缝合疗效的影响,对动物实验结果与临床疗效之间存在差异的原因进行初步探讨。方法清洁级SD成年雌性大鼠30只,随机等分为5组:损伤后直接修复组(0d);伤后1周(7d)修复组;伤后3周(21d)修复组;伤后6周(42d)修复组;对照组(controlling group,CG)。将大鼠右侧肌皮神经切断后旷置不同时间作为受体神经,以同侧尺神经作为供体神经。饲养3个月后,对实验动物进行神经电生理及病理组织学检测。结果术后3个月,在电生理、肌肉、神经组织病理学等项目,延迟1周修复组的各项指标均为各组中最佳,与其余各组相比,差异具有统计学意义;直接修复组与延迟3周修复组部分指标差异元统计学意义;而延迟6周后进行修复组,各项指标的恢复程度较低,与其他各组差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论神经损伤后间隔不同时间进行修复,会对端一侧缝合的疗效造成影响;神经预变性1周后进行端一侧缝合可以达到较好的效果,但随着预变性时间的延长,手术效果逐渐变差;失神经支配后靶肌肉萎缩程度加重,其对神经端.侧缝合后功能恢复的影响可能是造成实验结果与临床疗效之间差异的原因之一。 Objective To study the influence of different intervals of delayed repair on end-to-side neurorraphy and to discuss the possible reasons of the disparity between the experimental studies and the clinical applications. Methods Thirty female SD rats were subjected to musculocutaneous nerve transection and randomized into 5 groups. The musculocutaneous nerves were reconstructed in the end-to-side fashion with the ipsilateral ulnar nerve at different intervals of delay. No delay (0 d repair), 1 week delay (7 d repair), 3 week delay (21 d repair), 6 week delay (42 d repair) and no repair (control) were the group assignments. Electrophysiological and histological examinations were carried out 3 months after the repair surgery. Results Evaluations conducted 3 months postoperatively showed that the 1-week delay group performed significandy better in eleetrophysiologieal and histological examinations than the other groups. There was no noticeable difference between no delay group and 3-week delay group in some tests. The outcomes were decreased in the 6-week delay group, which were significantly different from the other groups ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The interval of delayed repair can influence the effectiveness of end-to-side neuron'aphy after nerve injuries. The outcomes of the surgery were better after 1-week nerve pre-degeneration. However the therapeutic effect of end-to-side eoaptation decreased with the pass of time. Aggravation of muscle atrophy might be one of the possible masons to explain the incompatible results between the experimental studies and the clinical applications.
出处 《中华手外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期164-167,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery
关键词 神经再生 WALLER变性 周围神经 端一侧缝合 神经预变性 Nerve regeneration Wallerian degeneration Peripheral nerves End-to-side neurorraphy Pre-degenerated nerve
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

共引文献64

同被引文献22

  • 1尹维田,魏壮,刘飙,宋宗新.小间隙桥接法和神经外膜吻合法修复周围神经断裂的实验研究[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2005,31(6):869-871. 被引量:14
  • 2滕国栋,胡晓莺,袁光海,汤海萍.精神因素对拇手指再造术的影响[J].中华手外科杂志,2007,23(3):159-161. 被引量:10
  • 3Viterbo F,Trindade J C,Hoshino K,et al.Latero-terminal neurorrhaphy without removal of the epineural sheath.Experimemal study in rats[J].Rev Paul Med,1992,46(110):267-275.
  • 4Tarasidis G,Watanabe O,Mackinnon S E,et al.End-to-side neurorrhaphy:a long term study of neural Regeneration in a rat model[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,1998,119(4):337-341.
  • 5Watchmaker G P,Mackinnon S E.Nerve injury and repair.In:Peimer C.Surgery of the hand and Upper Extremity[M].New York:Mc Graw-Hill,1996:1251-1275.
  • 6Brenner M J,Hess J R,Myckatyn T M,et al.Repair of motor nerve gaps with sensory nerve inhibits regeneration in rats[J].Laryngoscope,2006,116(9):1685-1692.
  • 7Muschler G F,Nakamoto C,Griffith L G.Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,61(86):1541-1558.
  • 8Pfister L A,Papaloyzos M,Merkle H P,et al.Nerve conduits and growth factor delivery in peripheral nerve repair[J].J Peripher Nerv Syst,2007,12(2):65-82.
  • 9韩同坤,窦庆寅,陈峰,胡洪涌,阳闽军,蔡卫东,梁旭强.复合许旺细胞的猪肠黏膜下层桥接修复周围神经缺损[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(49):9635-9638. 被引量:5
  • 10连建强,董乐乐.端侧吻合修复周围神经缺损的研究进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2009,15(5):358-360. 被引量:2

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部