期刊文献+

单节段Coflex棘突间动力重建与后路360°植骨融合治疗腰椎退变性疾病的对比研究 被引量:10

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN Coflex INTERSPINOUS DYNAMIC RECONSTRUCTION AND LUMBAR 360° FUSION IN TREATING SINGLE-LEVEL DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL DISORDERS
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较单节段Coflex棘突间动力重建与后路360°植骨融合治疗L4、5退变性疾病的临床疗效与影像改变。方法对2008年10月-2010年11月采用后路减压联合Coflex棘突间动力重建术(A组,29例)治疗与后路减压、椎间及后外侧360°植骨融合术(B组,31例)治疗并获完整随访的L4、5退变性疾病患者进行对比研究。A组:男20例,女9例;年龄21~67岁,平均45.1岁;病程2个月~4年。B组:男16例,女15例;年龄32~86岁,平均56.2岁;病程3个月~6年。除年龄外,两组性别、病程、病因等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前及末次随访时对患者行日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、功能障碍指数(ODI)量表评定,并摄X线片测量病变节段及其上下节段椎间高度、椎间活动度及腰椎整体活动度。结果 A、B组手术时间及出血量比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组术后并发脑脊液漏2例;B组术中并发硬膜撕裂1例、椎管内静脉丛出血1例,术后脑脊液漏2例;两组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.119,P=0.731)。A组随访时间12~21个月,B组为12~23个月。末次随访时A、B组VAS、JOA评分及ODI均优于术前(P<0.05);且A组VAS评分优于B组(P<0.05)。A、B组手术前后L4、5及L5、S1椎间高度比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组L3、4椎间高度手术前后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而B组较术前降低(P<0.05)。A、B组手术前后L5、S1椎间活动度及腰椎整体活动度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组L4、5椎间活动度较术前减少(P<0.05),而L3、4椎间活动度与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组末次随访时L4、5椎间隙已融合,L3、4椎间活动度较术前增大(P<0.05)。末次随访时,A、B组间L3、4椎间高度及椎间活动度比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余各指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 单节段Coflex棘突间动力重建与后路360°植骨融合术治疗L4、5退变性疾病疗效相当,但前者对邻近节段具有保护作用,更适用于青壮年初治及年老体弱复发患者。 Objective To compare the effectiveness and radiological changes of posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction or lumbar 360° fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders at L4.5. Methods Between October 2008 and November 2010, a comparative study was carried out on patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disorders at L4. 5. In group A, 29 patients underwent posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction; there were 20 males and 9 females with an average age of 45.1 years (range, 21-67 years); and the disease duration was 2 months to 4 years. In group B, 31 patients underwent posterior decompression combined with lumbar 360° fusion treatment; there were 16 males and 15 females with an average age of 56.2 years (range, 32-86 years); and the disease duration was 3 months to 6 years. Except the age, there was no significant difference in gender, disease duration, and etiology etc. between 2 groups (P 〉 0.05). The results were assessed by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral height of affected and adjacent segments, and the ROM of lumbar were measured before operation and last follow-up. Results Significant differences were found in the operative time and blood loss between 2 groups (P 〈 0.05). Intraoperative dural tear occurred in 1 case of group B, spinal canal venous plexus hemorrhage in 1 case of group B, and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 2 cases of group A and B respectively, showing no significant difference (Z2=0.119, P=0.731). The follow-up was 12-21 months in group A and was 12-23 months in group B. At the last follow-up, the JOA, VAS scores, and ODI of groups A and B were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative values (P 〈 0.05). The VAS score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant difference in the intervertebral height of L4, 5 and L, SI of groups A and B between pre- and post-operation (P 〉 0,05). In group B, the intervertebral height of L, 4 was significantly reduced (P 〈 0.05) compared with the preoperative one. There was no significant difference in the ROM of Ls, S~ and ROM of lumbar in groups A and B between pre- and post-operation (P 〉 0.05). At last follow-up, the ROM of L4, 5 was significantly reduced in group A (P 〈 0.05), and the ROM of L3,4 was significantly increased in group B (P 〈 0.05). Except significant differences in the intervertebral height and ROM of L3,4 between 2 groups (P 〈 0.05), no significant difference was found in other parameters (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction has the same effectiveness as lumbar 360~ fusion in treating degenerative lumbar spinal disorders at L4, 5, but the former has a protective effect on the adjacent segments of fusion and is recommended for initial treatment of young adults and the elderly and frail patients with recurrent.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期693-698,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 腰椎退变性疾病 COFLEX 动力重建 后路减压 360°融合 Degenerative lumbar spinal disorder Coflex Dynamic reconstruction Posterior decompression 360° fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G. The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24(17): 1820-1832.
  • 2Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, et al. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 4(4): 304-309.
  • 3Kroppenstedt S, Guide M, Schonmayr R, et al, Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages follow-up study over more than seven years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(19): 2083-2088.
  • 4Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(14): 1837-1842.
  • 5Schulte TL, Leistra P, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduction in adja- cent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360° fusion. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16:2152-2158.
  • 6Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, et al. Risk factors for adjacent seg- ment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(14): 1535-1540.
  • 7Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J, 2001, 10(4): 314-319.
  • 8Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty.Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(15): 1701-1707.
  • 9Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis withsegmental instability. J Korean Med Sci, 2007, 22(2): 330-335.
  • 10Yong SB, Yoon Ha, Poong GA, et al. Interspinous implantation for degenerative lumbar spine: clinical and radiological outcome at 3-yr follow up. Kor J Spine, 2008, 5(3): 130-135.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Multi-slice spiral CT 3-dimensional reconstruction tech-nique to treat multi-segmental degenerative spinal steno-sis with traumatic instability of lower cervical spine[J].Chinese Journal of Traumatology,2009,12(1). 被引量:5
  • 2关凯,孙天胜,李放,时述山.动态固定及其在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用现状[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(9):709-711. 被引量:9
  • 3Wong HK, Goh JC, Goh PS. Paired cylindrical interbody cage fit and facetectomy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population. Spine,2001,26 : 572-577.
  • 4Hasegawa K, lkeda M, Washio T, et al. An experimental study of porcine lumbar segmental stiffness by the distraction-compression principle using a threaded interbody cage. J Spinal Disord, 2000, 13:247-252.
  • 5Senegas J, Vital JM, Pointillart V, et al. Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system. Ear Spine J, 2007, 16 : 1279-1287.
  • 6Guigui P, Dessarts I, Morvan G, et al. Fractures of the ischium after laminoarthrectomy. Retrospective study of a series of 31 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 1998,84:247- 257.
  • 7Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG. Dynamic interspinnus process technology. Spine, 2005, 30 Suppl 16:S73-78.
  • 8Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007, 20:255-261.
  • 9Dickerman RD, Reynolds AS, Zigler J, et al. Adjacent-segment degeneration [ J ]. J Neurosurg Spine,2009,2 : 177.
  • 10Etebar S, Cahill DW. Rish factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability [ J ]. J Neurosurg Spine, 1999,2 : 163 - 169.

共引文献57

同被引文献184

引证文献10

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部