期刊文献+

考虑土体小应变特性的一种实用本构模型 被引量:5

A PRACTICAL CONSTITUTIVE MODEL OF SOIL CONSDIERING THE BEHAVIOR AT SMALL STRAINS
原文传递
导出
摘要 土体小应变刚度特征是准确分析土与结构相互作用的重要因素。土体刚度的衰减速率宜由带有小应变量测装置的高等三轴实验确定,这制约了土的小应变刚度模型的应用。另外,虽然该类实验在国外已对典型土体进行了较系统的研究,但是在国内还鲜有报道。该文结合小应变理论,提出了加载为正弦函数和卸载为双曲线形式的弹塑性模型,并且针对多种土体将模型的计算结果与实验值进行对比,二者的基本符合证明了模型的合理性。 It is important to consider the small-strain stiffness of soil in analyzing the interaction between soil and structures.The attenuation rate of soil stiffness should be determined through advanced triaxial test with local strain measurement device,which restricts the application of small strain model.Although systematic study of typical soils has been carried out abroad through such experiments,it is rarely reported in China.This paper proposes an elasto-plastic constitutive model with sine function and hyperbolic function to simulate the stress-strain relations during loading and unloading respectively.The calculated results using the proposed model for a variety of soils are compared with experimental data and good agreement is found,which proves the model is reasonable.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期60-65,共6页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50808109) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2008BAJ06B01-5)
关键词 小应变 应力路径 非线性 刚度 本构模型 small strain stress path nonlinear stiffness constitutive model
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Izumi K, Ogihara M, Kameya H. Displacements of bridge foundations on sedimentary soft rock: A case study on small-strainstiffness [J]. G6otechnique, 1997, 47(3): 619-632.
  • 2Burland J B. The ninth Bjerrum Memorial Lecture: Small is beautiful-the stiffness of soils at small strains [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26: 499- 516.
  • 3Jardine R J, Potts D M, Fourie A B. Studies of the influence of nonlinear stress-strain characteristics in soil-structure interaction [J]. Grotechnique, 1986, 36: 377-396.
  • 4Mair R J. Developments in geotechnical engineering research: Application to tunnels and deep excavations [C]// Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Civil Engineering, 1993: 27-41.
  • 5Jardine R J. Some observations on the kinematic nature of soil stiffness [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1992, 32(2): 111-124.
  • 6Simpson B. Retaining structures-displacement and design [J]. 32nd Rankine Lecture, Geotechnique, 2006.
  • 7Puzfin A M, Burland J B. Non-linear model of small-strain behavior of soils [J]. G6otechnique, 1998, 48(2): 217-233.
  • 8Benz T. Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences [D]. University Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2007.
  • 9Stallebrass S E, Taylor R N. Development and evaluation of a constitutive model for the prediction of ground movements in overconsolidated soils, Geotechnique, 1997, 47(2): 235-253.
  • 10刘国彬,侯学渊.软土的卸荷模量[J].岩土工程学报,1996,18(6):18-23. 被引量:162

二级参考文献14

  • 1张孟喜,孙钧.受施工卸载扰动黄土的变形与强度特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(13):2248-2254. 被引量:23
  • 2邱金营.应力路径对砂土应力应变关系的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1995,17(2):75-82. 被引量:26
  • 3刘国彬,侯学渊.软土的卸荷模量[J].岩土工程学报,1996,18(6):18-23. 被引量:162
  • 4刘国彬,博士学位论文,1993年
  • 5朱百里,中国土木工程 学会第六届土力及基础工程学术会议论文集,1991年
  • 6郑颖人,岩土塑性力学基础,1989年
  • 7沈珠江,水利水运科学研究,1985年,2期
  • 8刘祖德 陆士强 杨天林.路径对填土应力—应变关系的影响及其应用[J].岩土工程学报,1982,4(4):45-45.
  • 9LAMBE T W.Stress path method[J].Journal of Soil Mech and Found Div,ASCE,1967,93(SM6):268-277.
  • 10曾国熙 潘秋元 胡一峰.软黏土地基基坑开挖性状的研究.岩土工程学报,1988,10(3):13-22.

共引文献187

同被引文献51

  • 1张嘎,张建民.粗颗粒土的应力应变特性及其数学描述研究[J].岩土力学,2004,25(10):1587-1591. 被引量:65
  • 2袁晓铭,孙静.非等向固结下砂土最大动剪切模量增长模式及Hardin公式修正[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(3):264-269. 被引量:33
  • 3韩煊,李宁,J.R.Standing.Peck公式在我国隧道施工地面变形预测中的适用性分析[J].岩土力学,2007,28(1):23-28. 被引量:358
  • 4Mair R J. Research on Tunnelling-induced Ground Movements and Their Effects on Buildings-lessons from the Jubilee Line Extension[C]//Response of Buildings to Excavation Induced Ground Movements. London: CIRIA, 2003:3 26.
  • 5Mair R J, Taylor R N,Bracegirdle A. Subsurface Settlement Profiles above Tunnels in Clays[J]. Geotechnique, 1993, 43(2): 315-320.
  • 6Chen L T, Poulos H G, Loganathan N. Pile Responses Caused by Tunneling[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviron mental Engineering, ASCE, 1999,125 (3): 207-215.
  • 7Kasper T, Meschke G. Parametric Studies for Shield Tunneling in Soft Soils[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of TC28 of the ISSMGE. The Netherlands:[s. n. ],2005:543-549.
  • 8Franzius J N, Potts D M,Burland J B. The Response of Surface Structures to Tunnel Construction[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2006,159 ( 1 ) : 3-17.
  • 9Cheng C Y, Dasari G R, Chow Y K, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Tunnel-soil-pile Interaction Using Displacement Controlled Model[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2007(22):450-466.
  • 10Swoboda G. Finite Element Analysis of the New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM)[C]//Proc 3rd Int Conf Num Meth Geomech. Aachen: [s. n. ],1979:581.

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部