期刊文献+

基于流域尺度的农业用地景观-水质关联分析 被引量:20

Analysis on linkage between farm landscape and water quality in Jiulong River watershed
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于Landsat遥感影像进行九龙江流域不同坡度类型的农业用地景观与水质指标(CODMn、NH4+-N、TP)的相关性分析,并分别对丰水期、枯水期、平水期的农业用地类型百分比与各水质指标进行线性回归。结果显示,坡度小于15°和大于25°的农业用地占总农业用地的面积比例与各水质指标呈较强的正相关。景观聚集度指数(CONTAG)与水体中TP浓度呈显著正相关,决定系数为0.565;香农多样性指数(SHDI)与水体中TP浓度呈显著负相关,相关系数为-0.527。丰水期和枯水期是九龙江流域水质变化较大的时期。对河流近岸100m范围内的农业用地类型组成进行统计发现,坡度小于15°的农业用地面积平均比例为74.3%。河岸缓冲区和陡坡农业用地的数量及分布是影响该地区水质及控制农业非点源污染的关键。 Correlation analysis was performed to explore the relationships between CODMn, NH4+-N, TP and farm landscape in the Jiulong River watershed. Linear regressions between water quality and farm land percents were also processed in flood season, dry season and average season. The results showed that the total proportion of farm lands located in the slopes less than 15 degrees and greater than 25 degrees were positively correlated with CODMn, NH4+-N and TP concentrations in the water. Contagion index (CONTAG) of farm lands was positively correlated with TP concentrations, and Shannon Diversity Index (SHDI) of farm lands was negatively correlated with TP concentrations. The determinate coefficients were 0.565 and -0.527, respectively. Water eutrophication was susceptible to farm land pollutions in flood season and dry season. The farm lands located in the slopes less than 15 degrees took up 74.3% in the 100m-width riparian buffer. The farm lands located in the riparian buffer and in the deep slopes played a crucial role in water quality management, especially the non-point source pollution control in the Jiulong River watershed.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期54-59,共6页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40901100 40810069004) 福建省自然科学基金项目(2009J01222)
关键词 水质 农田 环境影响 非点源污染 坡度 景观指数 water quality farm environmental impact non-point source pollution slope landscape metrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Roberts A, Prince S. Effects of urban and non-urban land cover on nitrogen and phosphorus runoff to Chesapeake Bay [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10: 459-474.
  • 2贺缠生,傅伯杰,陈利顶.非点源污染的管理及控制[J].环境科学,1998,19(5):87-91. 被引量:404
  • 3Baker A. Land use and water quality[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(12): 2499-2501.
  • 4王秀娟,刘瑞民,何孟常.土地利用及其变化对松辽流域非点源污染影响研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(4):555-560. 被引量:20
  • 5刘瑞民,杨志峰,丁晓雯,沈珍瑶,伍星,刘芳.土地利用/覆盖变化对长江上游非点源污染影响研究[J].环境科学,2006,27(12):2407-2414. 被引量:71
  • 6Herlihy A, Stoddard J, Johnson C. The relationship between stream chemistry and watershed' land cover data in the mid-Atlantic region, US[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1998, 105(1): 377-386.
  • 7Sliva L, Williams D D. Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality [J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(14): 3462-3472.
  • 8Johnson L, Richards C, Host G, et al. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems [J]. Freshwater Biology, 1997, 37: 193-208.
  • 9Wear D N, Turner M G, Naiman R J. Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: Implications for water quality[J]. Ecological Applications, 1998, 8: 619-630.
  • 10黄金良,李青生,洪华生,林杰,曲盟超.九龙江流域土地利用/景观格局-水质的初步关联分析[J].环境科学,2011,32(1):64-72. 被引量:131

二级参考文献233

共引文献1262

同被引文献430

引证文献20

二级引证文献352

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部