期刊文献+

不同冷热循环次数对复合树脂粘结后抗剪切强度的影响 被引量:5

Effect of Different Psychro-Thermal Cycles on Composite Resin Against Shear Force
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价不同冷热循环次数对复合树脂粘结抗剪切强度的影响。方法选30颗健康新鲜的恒磨牙,分为A、B、C 3组,每组10颗牙,每颗牙利用颊、舌、近中、远中四个面,在相应牙面的冠中1/3的平整处,用复合树脂制作直径2 mm,高3 mm的圆柱体,共40个面的试件。A组作为对照组,B、C组分别经100次和500次的冷热循环,测定A、B、C各组的抗剪切力,计算抗剪切强度。体视显微镜下观察受检试件断面的断裂类型。结果 3组抗剪切强度分别为16.36、12.56和10.91 MPa,A组和B组的剪切强度差别无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组和B组的抗剪切强度大于C组,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A、B、C 3组断裂模式差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论复合树脂粘结经冷热循环500次后,抗剪切力的强度下降。 Objective To evaluate the shear force of composite resin after cyclic mechanical loading.Methods Thirty healthy fresh molars were divided into Group A,B and C,10 in each group.On each of the buccal,lingual,mesial,and distal tooth surfaces and the corresponding tooth surface of 1/3 of the crown,a total of 40 surface cylinder samples were prepared with 2 mm in diameter,3 mm in height.Group A was treated as control,Group B and C respectively 100 and 500 psychro-thermal cycles.The shear force in each group was measured and shear strength calculated.The type of specimen fracture section was observed under the stereomicroscope(4×25).Results Shear bond strength of the three groups was 16.36,12.56 and 10.91 MPa,respectively.Group A and B showed no significant difference in the shear strength(P〉0.05) but both groups showed significantly greater shear strength than Group C(P〈0.05).The three groups showed no significant difference in fracture patterns(P〉0.05).Conclusion The anti-shear strength of composite resin adhesives decreases after 500 thermal cycles.
出处 《福建医科大学学报》 2011年第1期20-22,共3页 Journal of Fujian Medical University
关键词 复合树脂类 树脂黏固剂 牙修复体修补 牙黏合 抗剪切强度 温度 Composite Resins Resin Cements Dental Prosthesis Repair Dental Bonding Shear Strength Temperature
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Martin F E.Adhesive bonding-some clinical considerations[J].Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg,2006,9(18):30-35.
  • 2Hashimoto M,Fujita S,Kaga M,et al.In vitro durability of one-bottle resin adhesives bonded to dentin[J].European Journal of Oral Sciences,2009,117(5):611-617.
  • 3Kleverlaan C J,Feilzer A J.Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites[J].Dent Mater,2005,21(12):1150-1157.
  • 4Paulo E C,Roberto R,Marcela R O.Evaluation of micro-tensile,shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengh of adhesive[J].Dental Materials,1998,14(6):394-398.
  • 5Munck J D,Landuyt K V,Peumans M,et al.A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue[J].J Dental Research,2005,(84)2:118-132.
  • 6Ilie N,Kunzelmann K H,Hickel R.Evaluation of micro-tensilebond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage[J].Dent Mater,2006,22(7):593-601.
  • 7Meng X,Yoshida K,Atsuta M.Influence of light irradiation con-dition on microshear bond strength of dual-cured resin lutingagents[J].Dent MaterJ,2007,26(4):575-581.
  • 8Matinlinna J P,Lassila L V,Ozcan M,et al.An introduction tosilanes and their clinical applications in dentistry[J].Int J Prosthodont,2004,17(2):155-164.
  • 9Fujishima A,Fujishima Y,Ferracane J L.Shear bond strength of four commercial bonding systems to CPTI[J].Dent Mater,1995,11(2):82-86.
  • 10Miyazaki M,Sato M,Onose H.Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems[J].Oper Dent,2004,16(1):75-80.

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部