1YANG J., Jeon B.. and Oh S. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of the hydroforming process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 113: 666-672.
2Hama T., Ohkubo T., Kurisu K., et al. Formability of tube hydroforming under various loading paths. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, 177: 676-679.
3Mori K., Patwari A. U. and Maki S.. Finite element simulation of hammering hydroforming of tubes. Proceedings Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, June 17-20, 2003:498-501.
4Fann K. and Hsiao P. Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 140: 520-524.
5Mori K., Patwari A. U. and Maki S.. Improvement of formability by oscillation of internal pressure in pulsating hydroforming of tube. Annals of the CIRP, 2004, 53: 215-218.
6Moil K., Maeno T. and Maki S.. Mechanism of improvement of formability in pulsating hydroforming of tube. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2007, 47: 978-984.
7Mousavi M., Mori K., Hayashi K., et al. 3-D finite element simulation of pulsating T-shape hydroforming of tubes. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, 340: 353-358.
8Manabe K. and Amino M.. Effects of process parameters and material properties on deformation process in tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, 123: 285-291.
9Hama T., Asakawa M., Fukiharu H., et al. Finite element simulation of hamming of an automotive component. TUBEHYDRO 2003, Japan, 2003: 80-83.
10YUAN A. Y., ZHANG S. H., WANG Z. T., et al. Research on tube hydroforming numerically and experimentally. TUBEHYDRO 2007, China, 2007: 80-83.
