期刊文献+

新加坡国际国内商事仲裁制度比较研究 被引量:4

Comparative Studies on the Legal Regimes of International and Domestic Commercial Arbitration in Singapore
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 新加坡是亚洲乃至世界上重要的新兴国际商事仲裁中心。为减少法院干预以支持国际商事仲裁发展,新加坡采取了国际国内仲裁分别立法的模式,形成了各具特色的国际国内仲裁法律制度体系。文章采用比较研究的方法,考察分析新加坡国际国内商事仲裁法律制度中的仲裁协议制度和仲裁裁决追诉制度等。 Singapore is an important newly-developed center for international commercial arbitration in Asia even in the world. In order to minimize judicial intervene so as to support the development of its international commercial arbitration,Singapore adopts a dual-track legislation mode and established legal regimes on international commercial arbitration different from those on domestic commercial arbitration,Employing a comparative study method,this thesis examines in details the legal provisions regarding arbitration agreement and recourse against arbitral awards in both international and domestic arbitrations in Singapore.
作者 石现明
出处 《东南亚纵横》 CSSCI 2011年第4期34-39,共6页 Crossroads:Southeast Asian Studies
关键词 新加坡 国际商事仲裁 国内商事仲裁 仲裁协议制度 裁决追诉制度 Singapore International Commercial Arbitration Domestic Commercial Arbitration Arbitration Agreement Recourse Against Arbitral Award
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Andrew Chan, Alison Woodward, Singapore as a place for arbitration: recent developments, Arbitration, Vollume 69, No. 1,2003,pp.11.
  • 2Dinesh Dhillon, Colm Chow, Uniquely Singapore: the Development of International Arbitration Hub, Mealey's International Arbitration Report, Vol. 22, No.5,2007, pp. 1.
  • 32005 Statistical Report, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Volume 17, No. 1,2006.
  • 44. Lawrence G. S. Boo, Charles Lim, Overview of the International Arbitration Act and subsidiary Legislation in Singapore, Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 12, Issue 4, 1995, pp.75.
  • 5Column 625 of the Singapore Parliamentary Reports, vol. 63, on the sitting on 31 October 1994.
  • 6Michael Hwang, Andrew Chan, The Role of the Singapore Courts in Relation to International Commercial Arbitration, Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 16, Issue 4, 1999, pp. 102.
  • 7Coop International Pte Ltd. v. Ebel SA [1998] 3 SLR 670 at 703.
  • 8Jan Paulsson, International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, Singapore, the Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2010,pp.8.
  • 9The Dai Yun Shan, [1993] 2 SINARB 3; [1992] SLR 508.
  • 10The Benja Bhum,[1994] 1 SLR 88.

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部