摘要
目的探讨阴茎中部无针麻醉袖套式包皮环切治疗包皮过长的效果。方法选择包皮过长患者105例，随机分成A，B两组，A组40例，行阴茎中部无针麻醉袖套式包皮环切术，B组40例行传统阻滞麻醉及背侧切开环切术。对两组在麻醉剂量、起效时间、视觉模拟麻醉疼痛评分、出血量、水肿、切口愈合、外观满意度等方面进行比较。结果两组所有对比项目在两组之间的差异均有统计学意义。结论阴茎中部无针麻醉袖套式包皮切除治疗包皮过长比传统阻滞麻醉及背侧切开环切术更具有优越性，值得临床推广。
Objectives To investigate mid - penis sleeve circumcision with needle - free jet anaesthesia for the treatment of patients with redundant prepuce and observe the therapeutic effect. Methods Methods outpatient circumcision 80 cases with DPNB （ dorsal of penis nerve blocked） anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups, group A （40 cases）was underwent mid -penis sleeve circumcision with needle -free jet anaesthesia, group B （40 cases）was done dorsal slit circumcision with traditional DPNB, to study the difference in Anaesthetic Volume, the time of take effect, visual analogue scale （VAS）, bleeding volumne, the condition of foreskin hydropsia, operative incision healing, appearance satisfication percentage. Results Group A has statistical difference to Group B in all above mentioned index. Conclusions Mid - penis sleeve circumcision with needle - free jet anaesthesia has many advantages over the dorsal slit circumcision with traditional DPNB, deserving generally clinical application.
出处
《国际泌尿系统杂志》
2011年第3期302-304,共3页
International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词
包皮环切术
麻醉
阴茎
Circumcision
Anesthesia
Penis
