期刊文献+

应用操作过程规范图设计、评价临床基因扩增实验室的质量控制水平

Use of Operational Process Specifications to Design and Evaluate the Quality Control of Clinical Gene Amplification Laboratory
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 应用操作过程规范图(Operational Process Specifications,简称OPSpecs)设计、评价保证临床基因扩增实验室的质量控制水平.方法 以卫生部临检中心室间质评结果计算偏倚(Bias),以近一年的室内质控CV为方法的不精密度,利用BIO-RAD公司的Unity Real Time软件制作OPSpecs图,计算、选择HBV,HCV检测项目的 TEa和室内质控规则.结果 采用两个水平的质控品,以1-3s,2-2s,R-4s,4-1s,10 Westguard多规则为质控规则,实验室50%~90%的分析质量保证水平的TEa是8.3%-20.5%.结论 目前实验室的质量控制水平基本能够满足临床病毒检测的需求,在低水平的检测上,由于存在较大的变异系数,仍需要进一步提高其不精密度. Objective To design and evaluate the quality control level of clinical gene amplification laboratory by Operational Process Specifications (OPSpecs). Methods Bias was calculated using the data of external quality control results, which was organized by the National Center for Clinical Laboratory. Imprecision was indicated as coefficient of variation (CV) ,which was calculated using the internal quality control data of recent one year. OPSpecs charts were made using the Unity Real Time software from BIO-RAD. The total allowable error (TEa) and rules of quality control of HBV and HCV assay were calculated using the software. Results Using two level controls and the multiple Westguard control rules (1- 3s, 2-2s, R-4s, 4-1s and 102), to achieve the 50 % - 90 % quality assurance goal ,the TEa of individual control ranged from 8. 3%-20.5%. Conclusion The current quality control level of laboratory could achieve the requirement of clinical assay. But in the low level control the imprecision level was relatively high,which needs further improvement.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2011年第2期153-156,共4页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 操作过程规范图 基因扩增 质量控制 总误差 operational process specifications gene amplification quality control TE
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1中华医学会肝病学分会、感染病学分会.慢性乙型肝炎防治指南[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2005,13(12):881-891. 被引量:1957
  • 2李萍,刘小娟,徐克和,黄志刚.利用Westgard标准决定图判定测定方法性能[J].临床检验杂志,2006,24(1):69-70. 被引量:27
  • 3Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2000, 124 (4) : 516-519.
  • 4Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control [M]. 2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC,2006: 157- 184.
  • 5Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[ J ]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006, 125 ( 3 ) :343-354.
  • 6Coskun A. Six sigma and calculated laboratory tests [J]. Clin Chem,2006,52(4) : 770-771.
  • 7刘忠民 高月亭 陈涛 等.应用操作过程规范图评价和设计室内质量控制方法.医学实验室与临床,2007,14(4):17-20.
  • 8Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Equivalent quality testing versus equivalent QC procedures [ J ]. Lab Medicine, 2005,36(10) :626-629.
  • 9Westgard JO. Workshop Manual: Planning and Validating QC Procedures, 1996.
  • 10Lok AS, McMahon B J; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). Chronic hepatitis B: update of recommendations. Hepatology, 2004, 39: 857-861.

共引文献217

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部