期刊文献+

埃索美拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术术后并发症的对比观察 被引量:21

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection postoperative complications treated with esomeprazole and omeprazole
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察埃索美拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)术后并发症的疗效。方法随机双盲将41例行ESD治疗患者分为两组:A组20例,给予埃索美拉唑40 mg静脉注射,2次/日,疗程7 d,后序贯口服埃索美拉唑40 mg;B组21例,给予奥美拉唑静脉注射,2次/日,疗程7 d,序贯口服奥美拉唑40 mg。比较两组腹痛、创面溃疡愈合、消化道出血及不良反应情况。结果两组腹痛缓解的时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),创面愈合在7 d时埃索美拉唑组与奥美拉唑组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),14 d后A、B两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),不良反应比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论埃索美拉唑能更早促进ESD术后创面溃疡的愈合。 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of the endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) postoperative complications treated with esomeprazole and omeprazole.Methods 20 patients with ESD were randomized to observation group with 21 cases and control group with 41 cases.The observation group was administered esomeprazole(40mg twice a day),omeprazole(40mg twice a day)for 7 d.The therapeutic effct of each drug such as auound surface healing and their symptoms such as stomachache,perforation and adverse reaction were observed.Results There was no statstic difference between both of the groups in the degree of the stomachache release(P0.05).There was statistic difference between both of the groups in wound surface healing after 7 d postoperation(P0.05),but there was no difference after postoperative 14 d(P0.05).Less adverse reaction was observed in both groups.Conclusion Effects of esomeprazole can promote the earlier healing of wound surface after ESD.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第14期1397-1398,共2页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 奥美拉唑 手术后并发症 内镜黏膜下剥离术 上皮内瘤变 胃早癌 埃索美拉唑 omeprazole postoperative complications endoscopic submucosal dissection intraepithelial neoplasia early gastric cancer esoprazole
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1日本胃癌学会.胃癌治疗ガイドライン[M].3版.东京:金原出版社,2010.
  • 2Oda I,Saito D,Tada M,et al.A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer[J].Gastric Cancer,2006,9(4):262-270.
  • 3Ishikawa S,Togashi A,Inoue M,et al.Indications for /ESD in cases of early gastric cancer:relationship between histological type,depth of wall invasion,and lymph node metastasis[J].Gastric Cancer,2007,10(1):35-38.
  • 4包怀鸣,陈志荣,陈卫昌.早期胃癌的内镜诊断和治疗进展[J].医学综述,2006,12(5):303-305. 被引量:39
  • 5刘正新.内镜下黏膜切除术和内镜下黏膜下剥离术[J].中国消化内镜,2007,1(1):44-49. 被引量:9
  • 6横井千寿,斋藤大三.内视镜下黏膜切除术(EMR/ESD)の手技[J].外科治疗,2005,93(5):496-501.
  • 7Oka S,Tanaka S,Kaneko I,et al.Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2006,64(6):884-885.
  • 8Abe N,Yamaguchi Y,Takeuchi H,et al.Key factors for successful en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of early stage gastric cancer using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife[J].Hepatogastroenterology,2006,53(70):639-642.
  • 9Oka S,Tanaka S,Kaneko I,et al.Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2006,64(6):877-883.
  • 10Goldman RJ,Salcido R.More than one way to measure a wound:an overview of toolsand techniques[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2002,15(5):236-243.

二级参考文献31

  • 1胡伏莲.消化性溃疡发病机制的现代理念[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(3):189-190. 被引量:257
  • 2Tanaka H, Ohkubo T, Otani K, et al. Metabolic disposition of pantoprazole pharmacokinetics, a proton pump inhibitor, in relation to S- mephenytoin 4'- hydroxylation phenotype and genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1997, 62(3): 619~628.
  • 3Tygat GNT. Shortcomings of the first - generation proton pump inhibitors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2001, 13(suppl. 1) :29 -33.
  • 4Lindberg P, Keeling D, Fryklund J, et al. Review article: Es omeprazole- enhanced bio - availability, specificity for the pro ton pump and inhibition of acid secretion. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2003, 17 (4):481~488.
  • 5Hatlebakk JG. Review article: gastric acidity- comparison of esomeprazole with other proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharma colTher. 2003, 17 Suppl 1:10-15; discussion 16-17.
  • 6Lind T, Rydberg H, Kyleback A, et al. Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs. omeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastro- esophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2000, 14(8) :861-867.
  • 7Kentaro S, Kiichi S, Yao K. New Diagnostic Approaches for Early Detection of Gastric Cancer[J]. Dig Dis,2004,22(2) :327-333.
  • 8Matsumoto Y, Yanai H, Tokiyama H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of submucosal in early gastric cancer[J]. Gastroenterology,2000.35(5) :326.
  • 9Kobayashi M,Tajiri H,Seike E, et al. Detection of early gastric cancer by a real-time autofluorescence imaging system [ J ] . Cancer Lett, 2001 ,165 (5) : 155-159.
  • 10Ohkawa A, Miwa H, Namihisa A, et al. Diagnostic performance of gas-tric neoplasms[J] .Endoscopy,2004,36(8):515-521.

共引文献65

同被引文献143

二级引证文献243

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部