期刊文献+

数字化裂隙灯显微镜测量一维尺寸的可靠性研究

Study of the Reliability in one Dimensional Size Measurement with Digital Slit Lamp Microscope
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨数字化裂隙灯显微镜作为一种定量分析的工具应用于一维尺寸测量的可靠性。方法:3位观察者采用单盲法,分别在4倍、10倍、16倍、25倍、40倍和4倍、10倍、16倍的物镜放大率下,对游标卡尺上模拟人眼的瞳孔和角膜直径的4.00mm和10.00mm间距,使用国产数字化裂隙灯显微镜进行图像采集和重复测量,对测量的结果的正确度和精密度进行比较。结果:3位测量者(A、B、C)对4.00mm尺寸的图像进行测量,所测结果均数位于3.98~4.06之间。对10.00mm的图像进行测量,所测结果均数位于10.00~10.04之间。4.00mm测量结果显示,除测量者A4倍、测量者B25倍、测量者C16倍和25倍外,测量值与真实值的差异具有统计学意义。10.00mm测量结果显示,除测量者A10倍外,测量值与真实值的差异具有统计学意义。比较同一测量者对同一尺寸在不同的放大倍率的测量结果,除测量者A对10.00mm尺寸的测量无统计学差异外,其余测量结果之间者在不同放大倍率下对相同尺寸测量的结果均具有统计学差异。不同测量者对相同物镜放大倍率下的同一尺寸比较,除在4倍放大率下对4.00mm测量的结果无统计学差异外,其余测量结果之间的差异均具有统计学意义。所有测量结果的变异系数均低于5%;随放大倍率的增加,变异系数有降低的趋势。结论:数字化裂隙灯显微镜是作为一种一维尺寸测量工具,具有良好的精密度,在利用其做定量分析前进行测量的可靠性分析有助于减少系统误差对测量结果分析的干扰。 Purpose:To study the reliability in one dimensional size measurement with digital slit lamp microscope as a tool for quantitative analysis. Methods:Three single-blinded observers acquired and repeatedly measured the images of 4.00 mm and 10.00 mm size on the vernier caliper, which simulated the human eye pupil and cornea diameter, with home-made digital slit lamp microscope, respectively, in the objective magnification of 4 times, 10 times, 16 times, 25 times, 40 times and 4 times, 10 times, 16 times. The correctness and precision of measurement were compared. Results:Measurements were conducted on the of 4.00 mm images size by three investigators measurement and all averages were located between 3.98 to 4.06, and 10.00 mm images size 10.00 ~ 10.04. Measurement results of 4.00 mm showed, except A4, B25, C16 and C25, the difference of the measured value and the true value was statistically significant. And measurement results of 10.00 mm showed, except A10, the difference of the measured value and the true value was statistically significant. Comparison of the same size, the same investigators at different magnification measurements, except for investigators A's measurements of 10.00 mm dimensions had no significant difference, the others were all statistically significant. Compared the measurements of the same size with different magnification, except measurements of 4.00 mm in 4-fold magnification had no significant difference among the investigators', the remaining different results were statistically significant. The coefficient of variation of all measurement results were less than 5%; as magnification increased, the coefficient of variation decreased. Conclusion:The measurement of digital slit lamp microscope in one-dimensional size, with good reliability, should be used analysis reliability before used in quantitative analysis.
出处 《眼科学报(英文版)》 CAS 2010年第2期89-92,共4页 Eye Science
关键词 裂隙灯 测量 误差 定量分析 Slit lamp Measurement Error Quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1王涛,刘杏,钟毅敏,黄晶晶,曾阳发,毛真,肖辉,吴文捷.小梁切除术后功能性滤过泡大小与眼压的相关分析[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2008,26(7):665-668. 被引量:2
  • 2张海娟,马科,刘爱珍.兔角膜损伤面积测量的图像处理方法[J].眼科,2004,13(2):106-108. 被引量:4
  • 3曾阳发,刘杏,王涛,李媚,李彬彬,何明光.正常人眼前段组织与房角开放度数的关系[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2009,30(4):450-453. 被引量:12
  • 4Lee AC,Qazi MA,Pepose JS.Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation[J].Curt Opin Ophthalmol,2008,19(1):13-17.
  • 5Nolan W.Anterior segment imping:ultrasound biomiemscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography[J].Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2008,19(2):115-121.
  • 6Sakam LM,Lavanya R,Friedman DS,et al.Assessment of the Scleral Spur in Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Images[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2008,126(2):181-185.
  • 7Console JW,Sakata LM,Aung T,et al.Quantitative analysis of anterior segment optical coherence tomography images:the Zhongshan Angle Assessment Program[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2008,92(12):1612-1616.
  • 8沙定国.误差分析与测量不确定度评定[M].中国计量出版社,2006:16-19.

二级参考文献34

  • 1张少斌,黄惠春,郑煜.透明晶状体吸除联合房角分离治疗原发性闭角型青光眼──附32例35眼报告[J].新医学,2004,35(7):406-408. 被引量:5
  • 2叶天才,毛文书,陆道平,彭寿雄,陈秀琦,许京京,于强,程冰,朱斯平.原发性闭角型青光眼易感眼的简易筛选方法比较[J].中华眼科杂志,1995,31(5):341-344. 被引量:12
  • 3毛真,刘杏,钟毅敏.青光眼滤过泡感染及滤过泡相关性眼内炎临床分析[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2006,24(1):55-58. 被引量:16
  • 4Skuta GL, Panfish RK 2nd. Wound healing in glaucoma filtering surgery. Surv Ophthalmol, 1987,32: 149-170.
  • 5Sacu S, Rainer G; Findl O, et al. Correlation between the early morphological appearance of filtering blebs and outcome of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C, J Glaucoma, 2003,12:430-435.
  • 6Polikoff LA, Taglienti A, Chanis RA, et al. Is intraocular pressure in the early postoperative period predictive of antimetabolite-augmented filtration surgery success? J Glaucoma, 2005,14(6 ):497-503.
  • 7Cantor LB, Mantravadi A, WuDunn D, et al. Morphologic classification of filtering blebs after glaucoma filtration surgery: the Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. J Glaucoma, 2003,12: 266-271.
  • 8Anthony P. Wells, N. N. Ashraff, MRCOphth, et al. Comparison of Two Clinical Bleb Grading Systems. Ophthalmology, 2006,113 : 77-83.
  • 9Yamamoto T, Sakuma T, Kitazawa Y. An ultrasound biomicroscopic study of filtering blebs after mitomycin C trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology, 1995,102:1770-1776.
  • 10Khairy HA, Atta HR, Green FD, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in deep sclerectomy.Eye, 2005,19 : 555-560.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部