期刊文献+

多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片对原发性肝癌诊断价值的再评价 被引量:2

Re-evaluation of Multi-tumor Marker Protein Biochip Detective System in Diagnosis of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的再次评价多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统对肝癌的诊断价值,指导该检测方法在临床诊断中正确应用。方法用多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统测定分析96例肝癌患者,93例良性肝病患者和90例健康人血清中12种肿瘤标志物(CA19-9、NSE、CEA、CA242、CA125、CA153、AFP、Fer-ritin、f-PSA、PSA、β-HCG、HGH)的水平。结果通过统计分析,发现AFP、CA242、Ferritin、CA19-9四种标志物水平在肝癌组比良性肝病组明显升高,差别具有统计学意义;采用上述四项标志物联合检测的阳性率为75%,高于该检测系统中任何单一指标的阳性率。结论本研究中多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统联合检测肝癌的敏感度仅提高至75%,低于多篇文章报道的所能达到的敏感度82.89%~91.6%。 Objective To re-evaluate the diagnostic value of multi-tumor marker protein biochip detective system for liver cancer,and to guide the proper application of the detection method in clinical diagnosis.Methods Using the multi-tumor markers protein biochip detective system to determine and analyze the concentration values of 12 tumor markers(CA19-9,NSE,CEA,CA242,CA125,CA153,AFP,Ferritin,f-PSA,PSA,β-HCG,HGH) in the serum levels of 99 liver cancer patients,93 benign liver disease patients and 90 healthy persons.Results By statistical analysis,we found that the concentrations of AFP,Fer,CA19-9,CA242 were all higher in the PHC group than in the non-PHC groups;the difference was significant;combined measurement of the above-mentioned four kinds of indicators,the positive ratio was 75%,had higher sensitivity than single tumor marker in the detective system.Conclusion In this study,adopting the multi-tumor marker protein chip detection system,the sensitivity of combined detection of liver cancer was only increased to 75%,lower than the sensitivity of 82.89%~91.6%,compared to more articles.
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期294-297,共4页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
关键词 肝癌 肿瘤标志物 蛋白芯片 Liver cancer Tumor marker Protein biochip
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1[3]Sauerbrei W, Madjar H, Prompeler HJ. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by logistic regression and classification tree using Doppler flow signals. Methods Inf Med, 1998;37:226 ~ 234
  • 2[4]Albert R, Muller JD, Kristen P, et al. New method of digital image analysis with prognostic significance for node - negative breast cancer. Cytometry, 1996;24:140 ~ 150
  • 3[5]Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, et al. Artificial neural net works improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer, 1997; 79:857 ~ 862
  • 4[6]Bottace L, Drew PJ, Hartley JE, et al. Artificial neutral networks applied to outcome predictions for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions.Lancer, 1997;350:469~472
  • 5[7]Naguib RNG, Robinson MC, Neal DE, et al. Neural network anal ysis of combines conventional and experimental prognostic markers in prostate cancer: A pilot study. Br J Cancer, 1998;78:246~250
  • 6[8]Jefferson MF, Pendleton N, Lucas SB, et al. Comparison of a ge netic algorithm neural network with logistic regression for predicting outcome after surgery for patients with non - small cell lung carcino ma. Cancer 1997;79:1338 ~ 1342
  • 7[9]Sedlaczek P, Frydecka I, Gabrys M, et al. Comparative analysis of CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, and soluble inter leukin - 2receptor alpha levels in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer, 2002;95(9): 1886 ~ 1893
  • 8[10]Schutter EM, Davelaar EM, Van Kamp GL, et al. The differential diagnostic potential of a panel of tumor markers (CA 125, CA 15 - 3, and CA 72 - 4 antigens) in patients with a pelvic mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002; 187(2) :385 ~ 392
  • 9[11]Carpelan- Holmstron M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH, etal. CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72 - 4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gas trointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res. 2002 Jul - Aug; 22(4): 2311 ~ 2316
  • 10[13]Johnson PJ: The role of serum alpha- fetoprotein estimation in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 2001;5:145 ~ 159

共引文献29

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部