摘要
目的对干化学法和尿沉渣镜检尿液进行方法学比较。方法分别用干化学法、尿沉渣镜检786例女性尿液进行白细胞、红细胞测定分析对比。结果干化学法检测尿液白细胞、红细胞和尿沉渣镜检结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论干化学法检测敏感性高,但影响因素较多,适合常规检查和筛查,不能代替显微镜检查。由于女性特殊的生理原因,建议建立新的女性尿液检验参考范围并联合应用两种方法可以提高检出率。
Objective To compare the dry chemistry method and urinary sediment microscopy on the aspect of methodology.Methods We measured,analyzed and compared the results of urinary samples from 786 female by using dry chemistry method and urinary sediment microscopy,respectively.Results The result of RBC and WBC tested by the two methods showed a significant difference（P0.05）.Conclusion Dry chemistry method is more sensitive,however,there are many complicated factors influencing its result.It is only applicable for routine examinations and screenings,and it can′t replace microscopic examination.Considering the physical condition of female,we suggest to build the reference range of female′s urine examines and combine the application of both methods that can improve the detection rate.
出处
《检验医学与临床》
CAS
2011年第8期926-927,共2页
Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词
女性尿液
干化学法
尿沉渣镜
female′s urine
dry chemistry method
urinary sediment microscopy
