期刊文献+

血液透析和导泻疗法治疗肾综合症出血热急性肾功衰竭之比较 被引量:1

COMPARISON BETWEEN HEMALODIALYSIS AND CATHARSIS IN TREATING ACUTE RENAL FAILURE OF HEMORRHAGIC FEVER WITH RENAL SYNDROME
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨血液透析(血透)和导泻疗法治疗肾综合症出血热(HFRS)急性肾功衰竭疗效比较。方法血透组52例,用碳酸透析液、小剂量肝素化,平均透析380次。导泻组56例,用甘露醇、大黄、芒硝口服导泻,一日两次。结果对照两组BUN、Cr、尿常规恢复正常日数,血液组明显少于导泻组。P<0.01。结论对HFRS-ARF患者应及早实施血透。 Objective:To compare the effect of hematodialysis with that of catharsis in treating acute renal failure(ARF) of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome(HFRS).Methods:hematodialytic group(52 patients)were dialysed 3.8 time a day on average with dicarbonic dialysate containing,low dose heparinized ,while cathartic group(56 patients) were catharized with mannitol,rhubarb and mirabilite peros,twice a day by oral administration.Results:The days for BUN,Cr and routine urine examination to ricover norm in hematodialytic group(P<0.01).Conclusions:HFRS-ARF patients should be hematodialgsed in time.
出处 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 1999年第2期128-129,共2页 Journal of Taishan Medical College
关键词 肾综合症出血热 急性肾功能衰竭 血液透析 导泻 hemorrhage fever syndrome acute renal failure hematodialysis catharsis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

共引文献64

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部