摘要
《京都议定书》第一承诺期接近结束,国际社会依然没有达成后京都时代新的国际气候合作方案,国际气候合作陷入"囚徒困境"中。本文从方法论的角度认为,通过"对话"将每个国家或个人面临的"困境"转化为"我们"共同面对的困境,在不断修正中确立"后京都气候合作方案",从而消解这种困境。该合作方案应"尽量体现"《公约》中"公平但有区别的责任"原则,体现每个人碳排放的权利和减排的义务,并建立清晰的初始排放权和世界范围的碳交易市场条件。这样的方案也许是不完美。
The first commitment period of ＂Kyoto Protocol＂ will be ended, but the international society has failed to reach a new post-Kyoto international climate cooperation program. The game of international climate cooperation becomes a ＂prisoner＇s dilemma＂. The paper, from the perspective of methodology, argues that through ＂dialogue＂ , the dilemma of each country will become ＂our＂ dilemma, and a post-Kyoto climate co-operation program can be established in gradually revised process. Thus our dilemma will be overcome. The principle of ＇ fair but differentiated responsibilities＇in the convention should be reflected in the program. The right of carbon emission and obligation of carbon reduction of each person should be presented in the program , and the initial emission rights and the world carbon trading market should be established. Perhaps, such a program may be imperfect.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期100-105,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"博弈论的哲学基础及应用功能研究"(09BZ015)
江苏省社会科学基金项目"国际气候合作制度创新及对策研究"(08ZHB006)
关键词
气候变化
囚徒困境
对话
制度创新
群体理性
climate change
prisoner＇s dilemma
dialogue
institutional innovation
group rationality
